2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The neural mechanism underlying recollection is sensitive to the quality of episodic memory: Event related potentials reveal a some-or-none threshold

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

18
58
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(73 reference statements)
18
58
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to successful versus unsuccessful retrieval, the precision with which recollected information is retrieved was tracked by activity in AnG, consistent with recent EEG evidence that the late lateral parietal ERP effect is graded according to memory precision (Murray et al, 2015). This dissociation between hippocampus and AnG is consistent with the notion of a strongly interconnected cortico-hippocampal network in which hippocampus initiates retrieval, which is then further supported by cortical regions (McClelland et al, 1995), with increasing connectivity between different nodes in the network being related to superior mnemonic performance (Wang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to successful versus unsuccessful retrieval, the precision with which recollected information is retrieved was tracked by activity in AnG, consistent with recent EEG evidence that the late lateral parietal ERP effect is graded according to memory precision (Murray et al, 2015). This dissociation between hippocampus and AnG is consistent with the notion of a strongly interconnected cortico-hippocampal network in which hippocampus initiates retrieval, which is then further supported by cortical regions (McClelland et al, 1995), with increasing connectivity between different nodes in the network being related to superior mnemonic performance (Wang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Importantly, it is possible to separate behaviorally the probability of recollection success from the precision with which information is retrieved (Harlow and Donaldson, 2013; Harlow and Yonelinas, 2016), which can be differentially influenced by attention and retrieval practice (Fan and Turk-Browne, 2013). Furthermore, a recent EEG study supports the idea that variations in long-term memory precision may be associated with distinct neural signatures, finding the well-established left parietal old/new effect to be graded according to recollection precision (Murray et al, 2015). The observation that retrieval success and retrieval precision can be manipulated independently suggests that using continuous measures to differentiate such components will lead to a more detailed understanding of episodic memory retrieval at both behavioral and neural levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Moscovitch, 2008), or quantity versus quality of retrieval (cf. Murray et al, 2015). Regardless, the current data clearly demonstrates that priming can directly influence recollection.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…This approach is able to disentangle improvements in mnemonic precision and the probability that memories are retrieved (Fan and Turk-Browne 2013;Harlow and Yonelinas 2014;Sutterer and Awh 2016). Initial studies have found that these parameters are reflected by distinct neural signals (Murray et al 2015;Richter et al 2016), providing further evidence that separately modeling mnemonic precision and probability of retrieval is a meaningful distinction. Our results demonstrate that both the probability of retrieving long-term memories and the precision with which those memories are retrieved continue to improve with feedback over many repetitions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%