1999
DOI: 10.1162/089892999563490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Neural Circuitry Involved in the Reading of German Words and Pseudowords: A PET Study

Abstract: Silent reading and reading aloud of German words and pseudowords were used in a PET study using ( 15 O)butanol to examine the neural correlates of reading and of the phonological conversion of legal letter strings, with or without meaning. The results of 11 healthy, right-handed volunteers in the age range of 25 to 30 years showed activation of the lingual gyri during silent reading in comparison with viewing a xation cross. Comparisons between the reading of words and pseudowords suggest the involvement of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

26
150
2
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 271 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(128 reference statements)
26
150
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that this effect in the pars opercularis, STG and pars orbitalis was only present in L1 reading may be due to further attempts to phonologically decode and retrieve representations in the native language. Although there is prior evidence showing higher activation for pseudowords than words in these regions (Hagoort et al 1999;Burton et al 2005), this is the first study showing that this effect is present in L1 but not in L2 reading. These results partially confirmed, and qualified, hypothesis IV.…”
Section: Stronger Engagement Of Pseudowords Versus Words In Dorsal Recontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…The fact that this effect in the pars opercularis, STG and pars orbitalis was only present in L1 reading may be due to further attempts to phonologically decode and retrieve representations in the native language. Although there is prior evidence showing higher activation for pseudowords than words in these regions (Hagoort et al 1999;Burton et al 2005), this is the first study showing that this effect is present in L1 but not in L2 reading. These results partially confirmed, and qualified, hypothesis IV.…”
Section: Stronger Engagement Of Pseudowords Versus Words In Dorsal Recontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…However, differences between reading of words and pseudowords and between sets of words with carefully controlled properties such as frequency and consistency of sound to spelling mapping are now being explored in word reading tasks (Fiez et al, 1999;Hagoort et al, 1999;Paulesu et al, 2000). Inferior frontal activation has emerged in conditions such as reading nonwords that require an increased amount of grapheme to phoneme conversion compared to reading words.…”
Section: Phonology In Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One relatively reliable finding is stronger activation to nonwords than words in the left frontal operculum and adjacent anterior insula (Fiez et al, 1999;Hagoort et al, 1999;Herbster et al, 1997;Mechelli et al, 2003;Paulesu et al, 2000;Xu et al, 2001). Because the dual-route model proposes greater reliance on the nonlexical GPC system in the case of nonwords, these findings have often been interpreted as evidence for such a system in the left inferior frontal lobe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%