The Neural Basis of the Dynamic Unconscious

Abstract

A great deal of complex cognitive processing occurs at the unconscious level and affects how humans behave, think, and feel. Scientists are only now beginning to understand how this occurs on the neural level. Understanding the neural basis of consciousness requires an account of the neural mechanisms that underlie both conscious and unconscious thought, and their dynamic interaction. For example, how do conscious impulses, thoughts, or desires become unconscious (e.g., repression) or, conversely, how do unconscious impulses, desires, or motives become conscious (e.g., Freudian slips)? Research taking advantage of advances in technologies, like functional magnetic resonance imaging, has led to a revival and re-conceptualization of some of the key concepts of psychoanalytic theory, but steps toward understanding their neural basis have only just commenced. According to psychoanalytic theory, unconscious dynamic processes defensively remove anxiety-provoking thoughts and impulses from consciousness in response to one's conflicting attitudes. The processes that keep unwanted thoughts from entering consciousness include repression, suppression, and dissociation. In this literature review, studies from psychology and cognitive neuroscience in both healthy and patient populations that are beginning to elucidate the neural basis of these phenomena are discussed and organized within a conceptual framework. Further studies in this emerging field at the intersection of psychoanalytic theory and neuroscience are needed.Keywords: unconscious; psychodynamic; repression; suppression; dissociation; neural "Nothing is so difficult as not deceiving oneself."Ludwig Wittgenstein Cognitive unconscious processingThe intricate relationship between conscious and unconscious processes is one of the many mysteries that continue to perplex our understanding of ourselves.

Effect of Health and Wellness Values on Festival Visit Motivation

“…S -C-R model of human behavior is closely related to the model of "operant conditioning" (Berlin, 2011) that argues the best way to understand behavior is by observing the cause (cognition) of an action (stimulus) and its consequence (response). Iso-Ahola (1982) describes the S -C-R model as influenced by inputs and the relevant behavior.…”

Concentric and Diametric Spatial Structures of Relation: Exploring a Neutral Bridge Language between Quantum Physics and Neuropsychology

“…Neuroscience research on the limits of conscious perception provides fresh evidence for non-conscious processes and the large influence of it in our daily life (Berlin, 2011). A further step taken by Limar's (2011) framework is to engage with the hypothesis that molecular orbitals (electron shells) of molecules, biologically active during meiosis and mitosis are in some way material carriers of consciousness.…”

The case for neuropsychoanalysis: Why a dialogue with neuroscience is necessary but not sufficient for psychoanalysis

“…Fotopoulou, 2012c). In addition, mainstream investigators in cognitive neuroscience have increasingly turned their attention to the neurobiological basis of dynamically unconscious processes and their cognitive control (see Berlin, 2011;Fotopoulou, 2012c for reviews). Whereas in previous decades such progress was dominated by behaviourism and cognitive science in psychology, functionalism and computationalism in neurophilosophy, and reductionism in neurobiology and genetics, these paradigms are fast losing their popularity within the neurosciences.…”