2020
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1905590117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The neural basis of language development: Changes in lateralization over age

Abstract: We have long known that language is lateralized to the left hemisphere (LH) in most neurologically healthy adults. In contrast, findings on lateralization of function during development are more complex. As in adults, anatomical, electrophysiological, and neuroimaging studies in infants and children indicate LH lateralization for language. However, in very young children, lesions to either hemisphere are equally likely to result in language deficits, suggesting that language is distributed symmetrically early … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
115
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
11
115
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The whole-brain averages of task-evoked activity discussed above may not fully reflect inter-subject variability (see Olulade et al., 2020 for a discussion of similar issues), which we expected might be greater in those with DLD. To visualise consistency in patterns of activation across TD and DLD, we generated probabilistic overlap maps.…”
Section: Exploratory Analysesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The whole-brain averages of task-evoked activity discussed above may not fully reflect inter-subject variability (see Olulade et al., 2020 for a discussion of similar issues), which we expected might be greater in those with DLD. To visualise consistency in patterns of activation across TD and DLD, we generated probabilistic overlap maps.…”
Section: Exploratory Analysesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Finally, by simulating auditory nodes as externally driven functional units in a whole-brain network of Kuramoto oscillators (Kuramoto, 1984), we could generate the functional lateralization of ASSR. Second, when exchanging identities of areas that receive direct environmental input, e.g., replacing auditory areas that receive tonal cues with Broca's area receiving speech signals, we could predict the left hemispheric dominance of functional brain responses as reported by several language studies (Szaflarski et al, 2006;Riès et al, 2016;Olulade et al, 2020). Interestingly, our model also propose time-delays in coupling can affect the lateralization, e.g., allow transitions of left to right lateralization (Figure 4), which can provide important insights on why lateralization shifts are observed during ageing (Olulade et al, 2020) that is often associated with neurophysiological time-delays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Second, when exchanging identities of areas that receive direct environmental input, e.g., replacing auditory areas that receive tonal cues with Broca's area receiving speech signals, we could predict the left hemispheric dominance of functional brain responses as reported by several language studies (Szaflarski et al, 2006;Riès et al, 2016;Olulade et al, 2020). Interestingly, our model also propose time-delays in coupling can affect the lateralization, e.g., allow transitions of left to right lateralization (Figure 4), which can provide important insights on why lateralization shifts are observed during ageing (Olulade et al, 2020) that is often associated with neurophysiological time-delays. Thus, two levels of validationprediction of right hemispheric dominance during generation of ASSR and left hemispheric dominance of language qualifies this model as a canonical model for brain lateralization, which remains elusive to date to the best of our knowledge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Aside from a fixation cross that participants were asked to rest their eyes on throughout the scan, no visual stimulation was provided. The Forward>Reverse activation differences evoked by this task are highly robust and reproducible, making them suitable for localizing language-associated brain areas across development (Olulade et al, 2020) and even in cases of atypical functional organization, such as participants with a history of chronic epilepsy (Berl et al, 2014) or perinatal stroke (Newport et al, 2017). Imaging data were acquired on Georgetown’s research-dedicated 3T Siemens Trio Tim scanner with a 12-channel birdcage head coil.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%