2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.10.28.513278
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The neural basis of cost-benefit trade-offs in effort investment: a quantitative activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis

Abstract: Prominent theories of cognitive effort-based decision-making posit that shared brain regions process both potential reward and task demand, supporting the idea that effort allocation are informed by a cost-benefit trade-off, weighing the expected benefits of successful control against the inherent costs of effort exertion. While the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) has been proposed as a candidate region supporting this decision, it remains unclear whether dACC activity tracks rewards and costs as indep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(180 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the incredible heterogeneity of findings pertaining to dACC activity modulation as is relates to decision-making has been well-recognized (Castanheira et al, 2022;Kolling et al, 2016;, which also could help to explain the lack of decision difficulty effects observed in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the incredible heterogeneity of findings pertaining to dACC activity modulation as is relates to decision-making has been well-recognized (Castanheira et al, 2022;Kolling et al, 2016;, which also could help to explain the lack of decision difficulty effects observed in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In particular, the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) has emerged as a prominent focus of study across both human and non-human studies of effort-based decisionmaking (Hosking et al, 2014;Lopez-Gamundi et al, 2021;Müller et al, 2021;Sayalı & Badre, 2019;Shenhav et al, 2013;Shenhav & Botvinick, 2015;Vassena et al, 2017;Westbrook & Braver, 2016). Nevertheless, there is much debate regarding the specific role the dACC plays in weighing the costs and benefits of engaging in effortful actions (Castanheira et al, 2022;Kolling et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%