2008
DOI: 10.1242/dev.009019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The neural adhesion molecule TAG-1 modulates responses of sensory axons to diffusible guidance signals

Abstract: When the axons of primary sensory neurons project into the embryonic mammalian spinal cord, they bifurcate and extend rostrocaudally before sending collaterals to specific laminae according to neuronal subclass. The specificity of this innervation has been suggested to be the result both of differential sensitivity to chemorepellants expressed in the ventral spinal cord and of the function of Ig-like neural cell adhesion molecules in the dorsal horn. The relationship between these mechanisms has not been addre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
66
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(128 reference statements)
4
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The net effect of this model would be a switch in axon responsiveness that would allow axons to first reach, and then be retained within, their correct final targets. This model is analogous to the switch models previously proposed to occur at axon intermediate targets (Butler and Tear, 2007;Chen et al, 2008;He et al, 2002;Law et al, 2008;Nawabi et al, 2010;Parra and Zou, 2009;Tessier-Lavigne and Goodman, 1996), but in this case the switch in responsiveness would occur at the final target.…”
Section: Role Of Type III Nrg1 In Sema3a Responsivenessmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The net effect of this model would be a switch in axon responsiveness that would allow axons to first reach, and then be retained within, their correct final targets. This model is analogous to the switch models previously proposed to occur at axon intermediate targets (Butler and Tear, 2007;Chen et al, 2008;He et al, 2002;Law et al, 2008;Nawabi et al, 2010;Parra and Zou, 2009;Tessier-Lavigne and Goodman, 1996), but in this case the switch in responsiveness would occur at the final target.…”
Section: Role Of Type III Nrg1 In Sema3a Responsivenessmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…In addition to guidance cues that can steer the growth cone, axon pathfinding involves extracellular signals that regulate whether an axon reacts to a guidance cue with an attractant response, a repellent response, or no response (Butler and Tear, 2007;Chen et al, 2008;He et al, 2002;Law et al, 2008;Parra and Zou, 2009;Tessier-Lavigne and Goodman, 1996). Sema3A is a diffusible repellent guidance cue expressed in the ventral horn and periphery that selectively repels axons of Ngf-dependent sensory neurons, preventing them from overshooting their normal targets in the dorsal horn (Fu et al, 2000;Messersmith et al, 1995;Pond et al, 2002;Puschel et al, 1996;Wright et al, 1995).…”
Section: Role Of Type III Nrg1 In Sema3a Responsivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1b,c). TAG-1 is a cell adhesion molecule that is highly expressed in sensory growth cones and is essential for Sema3A signalling 32 . Our analysis of E13, E14 and E15 sensory growth cones indicated a gradual increase in TAG-1 immunofluorescence in both , to promote growth of proprioceptive or cutaneous axons, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The receptor complex for the axonal repellant Semaphorin3A (Sema3A) comprises two core elements: Neuropilin-1 (Nrp1), which binds the ligand but lacks signalling capabilities [25][26][27] , and type-A Plexin, which transmits the signal 28,29 . Two other components implicated in activation of the response to Sema3A and endocytosis of the receptor complex, respectively, are the L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1-CAM) and the transiently expressed axonal glycoprotein-1 (TAG-1) [30][31][32][33] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These examples are not the norm as in the absence of single CAMs or ECM components, few defects are normally observed in neurons in axonal pathfinding or organization, such as in the loss of b integrin in a conditional knockout mouse (Schwander et al 2004). Further, these mutant phenotypes may not be explained by the loss of adhesive interactions per se, but instead may be ascribed to the proposed role of CAMs such as L1 or integrins as crucial accessory receptors involved in semaphorin signaling (Castellani et al 2000;Pasterkamp et al 2003;Bechara et al 2007;Wolman et al 2007;Law et al 2008;Wang et al 2008).…”
Section: Adhesive Cuesmentioning
confidence: 99%