Towards a New Standard 2017
DOI: 10.1515/9781614518839-013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The neo-standard of Italy and elsewhere in Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…judgement clusters of status versus solidarity traits" (Giles & Coupland, 1991, p. 35), in which "the former values [are] typically associated with standard(ized) varieties, the latter with non-standard varieties" (Giles, Hewstone, Ryan, & Johnson, 1987). Dynamism evaluations are increasingly associated with so-called "neo-standards" (Auer, 2017), prescriptively rejected, but vital modern varieties such as Flemish Tussentaal or Danish Low Copenhagen speech, which have even been claimed to be vital on account of their evaluation as modern, cool, hip, and assertive (Grondelaers & Kristiansen, 2013;Kristiansen, 2009). Sociolinguists who carry out speaker evaluation experiments to investigate standard language dynamics had better include dynamism measures to lay bare the perceptual correlates (if not "boosters") of these emergent standard varieties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…judgement clusters of status versus solidarity traits" (Giles & Coupland, 1991, p. 35), in which "the former values [are] typically associated with standard(ized) varieties, the latter with non-standard varieties" (Giles, Hewstone, Ryan, & Johnson, 1987). Dynamism evaluations are increasingly associated with so-called "neo-standards" (Auer, 2017), prescriptively rejected, but vital modern varieties such as Flemish Tussentaal or Danish Low Copenhagen speech, which have even been claimed to be vital on account of their evaluation as modern, cool, hip, and assertive (Grondelaers & Kristiansen, 2013;Kristiansen, 2009). Sociolinguists who carry out speaker evaluation experiments to investigate standard language dynamics had better include dynamism measures to lay bare the perceptual correlates (if not "boosters") of these emergent standard varieties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…anderen, auch Nicht-Standard-Varietäten durchlässig ist (Auer 2017;Cerruti 2017). Auer (2017: 369) schlägt vor, den Neustandard unmittelbar unterhalb des Altstandards zu verorten (Abbildung 2), da dieser zwar als überregional, jedoch als weniger prestigeträchtig als der Altstandard gilt und eine größere Variation als der Altstandard zulässt.…”
Section: Dekumulierende Strategienunclassified
“…dialektale Varianten galten, verlieren sie, wie oben erwähnt, durch den Einzug in den Neustandard ihre soziolinguistische Markiertheit und werden Teil der neuen Standardvarietät. Dieser Prozess wird dadurch erleichtert, dass der Neustandard als informelle Varietät für Einflüsse aus29 Eine Liste dieser Merkmale ist für das Deutsche inAuer (2017;, für das Italienische inBerruto (2012:…”
unclassified
“…Sono versioni regionali della lingua comune prodotte da parlanti che hanno perlopiù come L1 un dialetto primario: italiani regionali popolari, dunque, che sono il punto d'avvio per una »riorganizzazione del dominio dell'immediatezza« (Koch 2014: 84). Tali varietà, che coincidono con ciò che Auer (2005Auer ( , 2011 chiama regiolects o più recentemente regional sub-standards (Auer 2017), sono il frutto di un'azione agentiva guidata dalla lingua fonte: »the agent speaker performs a push transfer that affects a language other than his own, linguistically dominant language« (Van Coetsem 2000: 54; corsivo nell'originale).…”
Section: 2questioni Della Lingua: Cinquecento E Ottocentounclassified