Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2019
DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2019.00016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Neglected Pieces of Designing Collective Decision-Making Processes

Abstract: Autonomous decision-making is a fundamental requirement for the intelligent behavior of individual agents and systems. For artificial systems, one of the key design prerequisites is providing the system with the ability to make proper decisions. Current literature on collective artificial systems designs decision-making mechanisms inspired mostly by the successful natural systems. Nevertheless, most of the approaches focus on voting mechanisms and miss other fundamental aspects. In this paper, we aim to draw a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Requiring prior knowledge about the number of alternatives n may reduce the applicability of such solutions. As well as collectively selecting the best alternative, a decentralized process of decision-making should also include the phase of decentralized discovery of the available alternatives (23,24). Behaviors that proved successful in the voting phase may suffer a drastic reduction of their performance when both discovery and voting phases are considered (18).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Requiring prior knowledge about the number of alternatives n may reduce the applicability of such solutions. As well as collectively selecting the best alternative, a decentralized process of decision-making should also include the phase of decentralized discovery of the available alternatives (23,24). Behaviors that proved successful in the voting phase may suffer a drastic reduction of their performance when both discovery and voting phases are considered (18).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of such network is fundamental for collective decision-making. It is generally exploited at two stages of the process (i) when spreading information on one or multiple stimuli that are initially perceived by a limited number of individuals that are able to trigger the collective decision process—e.g., a predator attack—; and (ii) when spreading the individuals' opinions or choices to achieve consensus (Khaluf et al, 2019a ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will inherit methods from intelligent agents, multi-agent systems, and swarm systems [17] to design group coordination and interaction [18], [19]. We plan to focus on developing efficient strategies for collective decisions [20] made by groups of interacting ChronoPilots. Such decisions may be the outcome of a negotiation process to harmonize time perception across the group individuals.…”
Section: Collective Time Perception and Coordinationmentioning
confidence: 99%