The Negative Consequences of Overambitious Curricula in Developing Countries

Abstract

Learning profiles that track changes in student skills per year of schooling often find shockingly low learning gains. Using data from three recent studies in South Asia and Africa, we show that a majority of students spend years of instruction with no progress on basics. We argue shallow learning profiles are in part the result of curricular paces moving much faster than the pace of learning. To demonstrate the consequences of a gap between the curriculum and student mastery, we construct a simple, formal model, which portrays learning as the result of a match between student skill and instructional levels, rather than the standard (if implicit) assumption that all children learn the same from the same instruction. A simulation shows that two countries with exactly the same potential learning could have massively divergent learning outcomes, just because of a gap between curricular and actual pace-and the country which goes faster has much lower cumulative learning. We also show that our simple simulation model of curricular gaps can replicate existing experimental findings, many of which are otherwise puzzling. Paradoxically, learning could go faster if curricula and teachers were to slow down.www.cgdev.org Lant Pritchett and Amanda BeattyElectronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2102726 The Negative Consequences of Overambitious Curricula in Developing CountriesLant Pritchett Non-Resident Fellow, CGD Kennedy School of Government, Harvard Amanda Beatty Innovations for Poverty ActionWe would like to thank many, while implicating none. This paper grew out of insights gleaned from conversations with Rukmini Banerji and her tireless efforts to improve learning in India. Conversations with Luis

Who Learns What in Basic Education? Evidence from Indonesia

“…To summarize, we observed that some learning takes place in all schools, even in low-output schools, but not all students are learning the curriculum material and those who are too far behind do not seem to catch up. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis put forward by Pritchett and Beatty (2012), which was that students who are on track or not too far behind are learning, and those who were behind stay behind.…”

Accounting for Mathematics Performance of High School Students in Mexico: Estimating a Coordination Game in the Classroom

“…This explanation is consistent with that given byPritchett and Beatty (2012), who argue that the slow pace of learning evident in a number of developing countries is the result of reliance on overly ambitious curricula.10 This paper builds on a growing literature that combines structural estimation with randomized controlled experiments (seeTodd and Wolpin [2006] and the citations within).…”

Starting behind and staying behind in South Africa

“…Both Pritchett and Beatty (2012) and Banerjee and Duflo (2011) have identified that students in developing countries have large learning deficits. They show that even children with relatively high levels of educational attainment often have very few cognitive skills to show for all their years of schooling.…”