2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2010.04.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The negative answer to Kameko's conjecture on the hit problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
87
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorem 3 (Kameko, 1990;Sum, 2010). Let a, b be monomials in P(n) such that w j (a) = 0 for j > r > 0.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 3 (Kameko, 1990;Sum, 2010). Let a, b be monomials in P(n) such that w j (a) = 0 for j > r > 0.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then Q(M) is a graded vector space over F 2 and a basis for Q(M) lifts to a minimal generating set for M as a module over A 2 . Kameko [7] computed dim(Q d (P(n))) for n = 1, 2, 3 and conjectured a best upper bound n k=1 (2 k − 1) for general n. Nguyen Sum [10] showed that this conjecture is true for n = 4. However, in a recent paper [11] he proved that this conjecture turns out to be wrong for any n > 4.…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then θ commutes with the coboundary map δ, and thus induces an endomorphism on Ext * , * E 0 A (Z/2, Z/2). On H * (BV s ), there is also a squaring map constructed by Kameko [8] in his thesis which has been extremely useful in the study of the hit problem (see for example Sum [21]). It is given explicitly as follows.…”
Section: The Squaring Operationsmentioning
confidence: 99%