2014
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.1841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Need to Revisit VTE Quality Measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although controversial, VTE detected by administrative data are being used to assess hospital quality[13]. The PSI-12 is used as a measure for pay-for-performance for post-operative VTE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although controversial, VTE detected by administrative data are being used to assess hospital quality[13]. The PSI-12 is used as a measure for pay-for-performance for post-operative VTE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hospital quality measures, such as the Surgical Care Improvement Project VTE-2 (SCIP-VTE-2) and Patient Safety Indicator 12 (PSI-12), publicly report postoperative VTE prophylaxis data and are part of quality-based payment initiatives. 24 Importantly, the PSI-12 does not take into account current risk-assessment paradigms, and penalizes hospitals for VTE development whether or not the patient received appropriate risk-adjusted prophylaxis. 24 Nonadherence to guidelines continues to be a significant issue, and likely contributes, at least in part, to stable or increasing incidence of in-hospital VTE.…”
Section: The Institution Of Risk Assessment In the Hospital Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Importantly, the PSI-12 does not take into account current risk-assessment paradigms, and penalizes hospitals for VTE development whether or not the patient received appropriate risk-adjusted prophylaxis. 24 Nonadherence to guidelines continues to be a significant issue, and likely contributes, at least in part, to stable or increasing incidence of in-hospital VTE. 22,25 Inadequate or inaccurate risk estimation has been shown to lead to poor outcomes.…”
Section: The Institution Of Risk Assessment In the Hospital Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More vigilant hospitals that have a lower threshold to order an imaging study may find higher occurrences of VTE, and paradoxically be deemed a poor performer. Surveillance bias and the lack of validity of the VTE outcome measurement highlighted the importance of utilizing process‐of‐care measures in assessing hospital VTE prevention efforts . Thus, when the Joint Commission enacted 6 new VTE core process‐of‐care measures on January 1, 2013 to monitor hospital performance on VTE prophylaxis administration and VTE treatment (Table ), NMH undertook a hospital‐wide quality‐improvement (QI) project utilizing the define‐measure‐analyze‐improve‐control (DMAIC) process improvement (PI) methodology to optimize their performance on these core measures as well as the Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) SCIP‐VTE‐2 measure.…”
Section: Issues and Targeted Interventions By Vte Measurementioning
confidence: 99%