2017 IEEE 41st Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/compsac.2017.237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Need for Traceability in Heterogeneous Systems: A Systematic Literature Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several existing techniques that aim to model traceability among heterogeneous domains. However, in a systematic literature review conducted in (Mustafa and Labiche, 2017), existing traceability approaches are either limited to a specific domain and problem, or they lack to specify traceability link semantics. For example, a Traceability Information Model (TIM) has been proposed in (Taromirad et al, 2013) for capturing heterogeneous artefacts in the context of the safety-critical systems domain where the TIM is defined on top of multi-domains using Ecore (Steinberg et al, 2009) metamodeling language.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are several existing techniques that aim to model traceability among heterogeneous domains. However, in a systematic literature review conducted in (Mustafa and Labiche, 2017), existing traceability approaches are either limited to a specific domain and problem, or they lack to specify traceability link semantics. For example, a Traceability Information Model (TIM) has been proposed in (Taromirad et al, 2013) for capturing heterogeneous artefacts in the context of the safety-critical systems domain where the TIM is defined on top of multi-domains using Ecore (Steinberg et al, 2009) metamodeling language.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the heterogeneity of software tools that are used in systems engineering, all tools need to be equipped with interfaces that exchange data in a unified format, so that the syntax and semantics of the traceability data are compatible. Different "traceability information models" (TIM) have been developed that define the data model used to describe the traceability links between different entities (Mustafa and Labiche, 2017). However, up to now, no universal TIM was established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been notable literature reviews on specific themes of traceability, such as technology (Costa et al 2013;Pournader et al 2020;Wang, Han, and Beynon-Davies 2019) and legislation (Borit and Santos 2015); as well as reviews based on its relationship with other SC management concepts such as risk management (Ringsberg 2014) and sustainability (Garcia-Torres et al 2019). There are also some reviews on the benefits of traceability and its impact on SC performance, but these reviews have been limited either to a particular industry, with a focus on food (Opara 2003;Dabbene, Gay, and Tortia 2014) or computers and software (Omar and Dahr 2017;Mustafa and Labiche 2017), or to a particular technology, with a focus on blockchain (Pournader et al 2020;Feng et al 2020) or RFID (Nambiar 2010;Costa et al 2013). Thus, there is a need for a comprehensive review of the extant literature to integrate the benefits of traceability discussed across multiple industries and technologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This chapter describes our effort in understanding the requirements of a generic traceability model by designing a survey that aims to collect information related to the traceability of heterogeneous artifacts. This survey complements our systematic literature review [117] On the other hand, carrying out the study involves publishing the survey, collecting data, analyzing the data, and reporting the results. We provide here a description of all these aspects.…”
Section: Traceability Surveymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The purpose of conducting the survey is to get feedback from professionals in industry about their traceability practices and traceability tools. We incorporate our findings from the systematic literature review [117] and the needs of our industrial partner at CAE [149] in constructing the questionnaire. The aim of the questionnaire is to understand the drawbacks of existing traceability tools, the types of traceable artifacts, and the types and usage of trace links.…”
Section: Mitigating the Threats To The Validity Of The Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%