2018
DOI: 10.1111/mpp.12738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The need for speed: compartmentalized genome evolution in filamentous phytopathogens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
106
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for this separation of effectors and housekeeping genes is probably that regulatory changes necessary to optimise the expression of the effectors are easier to achieve if there are no housekeeping genes nearby, as co‐regulation effects that could bring the cell metabolism out of balance are less likely to occur. This means that effectors often localise to ‘compartments’ in the genome distinct from conserved genes (Frantzeskakis et al ., ). In Phytophthora and powdery mildew, this is realised by the location of effectors in gene‐sparse regions (Raffaele et al ., ; Spanu et al ., ; Raffaele & Kamoun, ; Hacquard et al ., ); in for example Colletotrichum , Fusarium and Leptosphaeria , this is enabled by physiologically dispensible chromosomes (Balesdent et al ., ; Vlaardingerbroek et al ., ; Plaumann et al ., ), and in Neofusicoccum and Ustilago this is made possible by clustering of virulence factors (Lanver et al ., ; Massonnet et al ., ).…”
Section: Pathogens Maintain Effector Reservoirs That Are Crucial For mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this separation of effectors and housekeeping genes is probably that regulatory changes necessary to optimise the expression of the effectors are easier to achieve if there are no housekeeping genes nearby, as co‐regulation effects that could bring the cell metabolism out of balance are less likely to occur. This means that effectors often localise to ‘compartments’ in the genome distinct from conserved genes (Frantzeskakis et al ., ). In Phytophthora and powdery mildew, this is realised by the location of effectors in gene‐sparse regions (Raffaele et al ., ; Spanu et al ., ; Raffaele & Kamoun, ; Hacquard et al ., ); in for example Colletotrichum , Fusarium and Leptosphaeria , this is enabled by physiologically dispensible chromosomes (Balesdent et al ., ; Vlaardingerbroek et al ., ; Plaumann et al ., ), and in Neofusicoccum and Ustilago this is made possible by clustering of virulence factors (Lanver et al ., ; Massonnet et al ., ).…”
Section: Pathogens Maintain Effector Reservoirs That Are Crucial For mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in some cases meiotic gene drives have been observed increasing their potential to be inherited and potentially explaining their abundance in pathogen populations [22]. Supernumerary chromosomes are usually gene poor and repeat rich compared to the corechromosomes, and form one illustration of the two-speed genome concept [12,23]. However, a clear association with adaptive evolution is not always evident as they do not necessarily carry virulence-related genes [9,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Frantzeskakis et al. ). Repetitive DNA may locally increase the mutation rate and contribute to gene duplications and structural variation among alleles (Ohta ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pathogens constitute model species for addressing this issue, as their antagonistic interaction with the host drives a co-evolutionary dynamics where positive selection recurrently replaces existing alleles in response to allelic changes in the host, a scenario termed arms race evolution (Tellier et al 2014). Based on the finding of high variability in specific genome compartments of several species, it has been proposed that plant pathogens represent exceptional outliers regarding evolutionary rates (Raffaele and Kamoun 2012;Upson et al 2018;Frantzeskakis et al 2019). Furthermore, their life cycles typically combine both asexual and sexual reproduction, raising the question of the importance of meiotic recombination on the rate of adaptation, as it has been evidenced in plant and animal species (Seidl and Thomma 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation