2020
DOI: 10.1002/edn3.164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The need for robust qPCR‐based eDNA detection assays in environmental monitoring and species inventories

Abstract: Effective management of lands, waters, mineral wealth and natural resources, and protection of biodiversity and ecological productivity in a changing climate requires thorough knowledge of the distribution and relative abundance of at-risk, sentinel, invasive, and pathogenic taxa. Advances in molecular technologies have greatly improved our ability to survey planet Earth's biodiversity in natural ecosystems and anthropogenically impacted areas. There are many examples in the scientific literature of the detect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
70
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…laboratory tests with reference tissue samples) and in situ validation (i.e. field tests with eDNA samples) (see Goldberg et al, 2016; MacDonald & Sarre, 2017; Langlois et al, 2020; So, Fong, Lam, & Dudgeon, 2020). Understanding the utility of an assay requires both knowledge of the context in which it has been designed, and a broader understanding of how it was developed.…”
Section: Criteria and Principles Of Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…laboratory tests with reference tissue samples) and in situ validation (i.e. field tests with eDNA samples) (see Goldberg et al, 2016; MacDonald & Sarre, 2017; Langlois et al, 2020; So, Fong, Lam, & Dudgeon, 2020). Understanding the utility of an assay requires both knowledge of the context in which it has been designed, and a broader understanding of how it was developed.…”
Section: Criteria and Principles Of Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, these values are obtained using a dilution series of quantified DNA amplicons or synthesized gene fragments (e.g. IDT gBlocks™ Gene Fragment) based on public or de novo reference sequences (Langlois et al, 2020). The LOD and LOQ have various definitions in the eDNA literature, but were recently standardised by Klymus et al (2019), where LOD is the lowest standard concentration at which 95% of technical replicates amplify and LOQ is the lowest standard concentration for which the coefficient of variation (CV) value is <35%.…”
Section: Criteria and Principles Of Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…faeces, excretion, shedding cells, gametes) and this eDNA can take different forms (tissues, cells, organites, nucleo-proteic complexes, …). The direct sampling of eDNA coupled with molecular analysis methods such as NGS (Shokralla et al, 2012) or quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) (Langlois et al, 2020) allow the detection and identification of aquatic species while overcoming organism capture. Although eDNA offers many promising applications, several methodological challenges remain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decreased precision at low eDNA concentrations is also linked with intrinsic technical limitations of quantitative PCR methods such as quantitative (q)PCR or digital droplet (d)PCR, the former being the most common method for targeted species detection and quantification. False positive fluorescent background signals (Strain et al, 2013) and contamination from non-specific amplification can lead to over-estimation of eDNA at low concentrations (Hunter et al, 2018; Langlois et al, 2020), such as would be expected from rare species eDNA. Stochastic variation of molecule distribution in an aqueous sample and the propensity of DNA to adsorb onto plastic tube walls and pipette tips are known to affect the proportion of positive results from low template concentrations (Ellison et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%