2014
DOI: 10.1177/1475921714546062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The need for guidance on integrating structural health monitoring within military aircraft systems

Abstract: Since September 2006, an international Aerospace Industry Steering Committee was assembled at Stanford University. Since February 2009, the committee has been formally working on developing guidelines for validating, qualifying and certifying structural health monitoring systems. Working within the G-11 division of SAE International, the committee has compiled guidelines for civil transport aircraft. Some of these guidelines can be used for military applications. However, military guidelines are needed to addr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the recent two decades, structural health monitoring (SHM) technology for aircraft structures is turned from fundamental research to engineering applications gradually, 14 but the process is rather slow and difficult. One of the main obstacles is the environmental and operational conditions (EOC) 58 which is complicated such as varying temperature, varying structural boundary conditions, and random dynamic load.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the recent two decades, structural health monitoring (SHM) technology for aircraft structures is turned from fundamental research to engineering applications gradually, 14 but the process is rather slow and difficult. One of the main obstacles is the environmental and operational conditions (EOC) 58 which is complicated such as varying temperature, varying structural boundary conditions, and random dynamic load.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, as to the aviation application of a damage monitoring method, the extensive and complementary validations on three levels including specimen level, component level, and full-scale level have to be performed. 2–4,42 No matter at which validation level, the damage monitoring method must provide stable, reliable, and acceptable results. In this article, the proposed method combined with the guided wave (GW) SHM technique is validated at the specimen and component levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural health monitoring (SHM) technology has gradually developed from the research in laboratory to aerospace engineering validations and applications, [1][2][3] in which the problem of reliable damage evaluation under time-varying conditions has become one of the main obstacles for applying SHM technology to real aircraft structures. 1,4 These time-varying conditions include environmental, operational, and structural boundary conditions and possibly others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, there is no theoretical predictive or simulation model to reliably describe the mechanics of cumulative fatigue damage in composites. 7,8 Hence, structural state awareness, diagnostics, and life predictions are primarily data-driven, mainly carried out using non-destructive inspections (NDIs) and structural health monitoring (SHM) techniques such as ultrasonic pitch-catch, pulse-echo, optical Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG), and acoustic emission (AE).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%