2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The necessity of feedback physics in setting the peak of the initial mass function

Abstract: A popular theory of star formation is gravito-turbulent fragmentation, in which self-gravitating structures are created by turbulence-driven density fluctuations. Simple theories of isothermal fragmentation successfully reproduce the core mass function (CMF) which has a very similar shape to the initial mass function (IMF) of stars. However, numerical simulations of isothermal turbulent fragmentation thus far have not succeeded in identifying a fragment mass scale that is independent of the simulation resoluti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hennebelle & Chabrier (2008), Hopkins (2012), andChabrier et al (2014) argue that the IMF emerges from the combined effects of gravity and lognormal density fluctuations in a turbulent medium (with the important assumption that the ratio between core and stellar mass is constant). Recently, Guszejnov et al (2016) combined these ideas by considering a model that includes both gravito-turbulent fragmentation and stellar radiation feedback.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hennebelle & Chabrier (2008), Hopkins (2012), andChabrier et al (2014) argue that the IMF emerges from the combined effects of gravity and lognormal density fluctuations in a turbulent medium (with the important assumption that the ratio between core and stellar mass is constant). Recently, Guszejnov et al (2016) combined these ideas by considering a model that includes both gravito-turbulent fragmentation and stellar radiation feedback.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, increasing density makes it easier for gas to fragment by lowering the Bonnor-Ebert mass. Krumholz (2011) and Guszejnov, Krumholz & Hopkins (2016) find that these two effects nearly cancel, yielding a characteristic mass that is close to independent of density. However, this proposition remains untested by simulations.…”
Section: Caveats and Cautionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, in these simulations the gas temperature and thus the effective equation of state was not calculated self-consistently, and the calculations did not include the effects of radiation from the stars themselves. That this radiation is in fact the dominant mechanism in determining the gas temperature structure was first pointed out analytically by Krumholz (2006) and numerically by Bate (2009), and both analytic models and simulations locating the origin of the IMF peak in stellar radiative feedback have been published by a number of authors (e.g., Offner et al 2009;Bate 2009Bate , 2012Bate , 2014Krumholz 2011;; Guszejnov, Krumholz & Hopkins 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…While IMF slopes this steep have yet to be robustly observed, an IMF slope this extreme could have more of an immediate implication for analytical IMF variation theories. For example, the functional form of the CMF could be mapped to a unimodal IMF slope to determine how high of a Mach number would be required to produce these extreme * M L ratios in theories that predict that high-Mach-number environments promote a bottom-heavy IMF (Hopkins 2013;Chabrier et al 2014;Guszejnov et al 2016).…”
Section: Implications For Imf Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some models find that the larger density fluctuations associated with higher Mach numbers in star-forming disks cause the low-mass turnover of the pre-stellar core mass function (CMF) to shift to lower masses, implying a more bottom-heavy IMF (e.g., Hopkins 2013;Chabrier et al 2014;Guszejnov et al 2016;but see Bertelli Motta et al 2016). These models are able to reconcile the universal IMF found across a range of Milky Way stellar populations with a bottomheavy IMF in more extreme star formation environments such as starbursts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%