1915
DOI: 10.2307/1132535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Necessity for a Public Defender

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1915
1915
1915
1915

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Chicago Committee, McCord, Peyton, Whitman, Olson, Vaughan, Abbott, Lisle (34,32,37,49,36,47,1,28) and others continually advocate the extension of the use of laboratories in connection with the court. The Chicago Committee, Adelman, Slopter, Ferrari, Goldman, and Myers (34,2,41,9,19,35) all urge the necessity of a public defender in order primarily that the indigent accused may have justice. They claim that in this way can be abolished the Grand Jury, the barbarous Third Degree, and legal technicalities of various sorts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Chicago Committee, McCord, Peyton, Whitman, Olson, Vaughan, Abbott, Lisle (34,32,37,49,36,47,1,28) and others continually advocate the extension of the use of laboratories in connection with the court. The Chicago Committee, Adelman, Slopter, Ferrari, Goldman, and Myers (34,2,41,9,19,35) all urge the necessity of a public defender in order primarily that the indigent accused may have justice. They claim that in this way can be abolished the Grand Jury, the barbarous Third Degree, and legal technicalities of various sorts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%