2020
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab64d1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Nearby Luminous Transient AT2018cow: A Magnetar Formed in a Subrelativistically Expanding Nonjetted Explosion

Abstract: The fast-rising blue optical transient AT2018cow indicated unusual early phase characteristics unlike relatively better studied explosive transients. Its afterglow may be produced by either a relativistically beamed (jetted) or intrinsically luminous (non-jetted) ejecta and carries observational signatures of the progenitor and environment. High resolution monitoring can distinguish between these scenarios and clarify the progenitor nature. We present very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) observations of AT… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AT2018cow was suggested to have two distinct components: a shock driven through dense equatorial material (producing the optical emission), and a faster polar outflow (producing the radio emission; Margutti et al 2019). As shown by early millimeter observations (Ho et al 2019b), later radio observations (Margutti et al 2019), and Very Long Baseline Interferometry (Bietenholz et al 2020;Mohan et al 2020), the fast outflow was subrelativistic with a near-constant velocity of = v c 0.1 . In ZTF18abvkwla, the radio-emitting ejecta is faster: >0.38c at the same epochs when the outflow velocity of AT2018cow was c 0.1 .…”
Section: Progenitor Systems and A Search For An Associatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AT2018cow was suggested to have two distinct components: a shock driven through dense equatorial material (producing the optical emission), and a faster polar outflow (producing the radio emission; Margutti et al 2019). As shown by early millimeter observations (Ho et al 2019b), later radio observations (Margutti et al 2019), and Very Long Baseline Interferometry (Bietenholz et al 2020;Mohan et al 2020), the fast outflow was subrelativistic with a near-constant velocity of = v c 0.1 . In ZTF18abvkwla, the radio-emitting ejecta is faster: >0.38c at the same epochs when the outflow velocity of AT2018cow was c 0.1 .…”
Section: Progenitor Systems and A Search For An Associatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nearby transient AT2018cow has drawn many comparisons to the cosmological RETs from DES and PS1 (e.g. Perley et al 2019;Margutti et al 2019;Fox & Smith 2019;Mohan et al 2020) due to its rapid evolution and blue colour. AT2018cow displayed a contracting photosphere as well as evidence for central-engine power alongside an unusual spectrum that showed similarities to broad-lined SNe Ic (SN Icbl) at early stages (e.g.…”
Section: Comparison With Individual Retsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transient declined from its discovery, with constraints on the rise time of 1 day, and from X-rays through to radio wavelengths did not resemble any known SN, GRB afterglow, or kilonova (KN;Ho et al 2019) . There are many diverse explanations for the power source of AT2018cow touted in the literature, including: magnetars (Mohan et al 2020); electron capture collapse of merged white dwarfs (Lyutikov & Toonen 2019); a tidal disruption event (TDE) of a white dwarf (Kuin et al 2019) or of a main sequence star by an intermediate mass black hole (Perley et al 2019); common envelope jets supernova (CEJSN;Soker et al 2019); or a wind-driven transient (Uno & Maeda 2020). Other nearby rapid transients include the local fast-declining SN-like transient SN2018kzr (McBrien et al 2019) which is explained by the accretion-induced collapse of a white dwarf or a white dwarf-neutron star merger, and KSN-2015K (Rest et al 2018) whose fast rise and decline is explained by the shock of an SN running into previously-expelled material.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The enigmatic AT 2018cow event (Prentice et al 2018) and similar FBOTs have promoted the development of several scenarios for AT 2018cow-like FBOTs (e.g., Liu et al 2018;Fox & Smith 2019;Kuin et al 2019;Lyutikov & Toonen 2019;Margutti et al 2019;Quataert, Lecoanet, & Coughlin 2019;Yu et al 2019;Leung et al 2020;Mohan, An, & Yang 2020;Piro & Lu 2020;Uno & Maeda 2020;Kremer et al 2021;Xiang et al 2021;Gottlieb, Tchekhovskoy, & Margutti 2022). In the present study I do not compare the different scenarios with each other but rather present the polar-CEJSN impostor channel (section 2) and its new ingredients (section 3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%