1980
DOI: 10.1086/157954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The nature of the nuclear sources in M82 and NGC 253

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

20
329
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 431 publications
(349 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
20
329
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The basic properties of the nuclear starburst are [24]: Bolometric luminosity > 5.0×10 10 L ⊙ , absolute K magnitude < −22.5, ionising radiation L Lyc > 10 54 photons/s, total mass in the starburst < 2.5 × 10 8 M ⊙ , CO index > 0.21 and supernova rate ≈ 0.1 yr −1 . Rieke et al [31,32] have pioneered the detailed modelling of this starburst galaxy, and have come repeatedly to the conclusion that stars with masses below a few M ⊙ form much less often in M 82 than in the solar neighbourhood. The argument for a top heavy IMF is basically that the infrared brightness -tracing the bolometric luminosity -is too high for the (dynamically measured) stellar mass, if one assumes a IMF similar to the field star IMF of Scalo [37].…”
Section: Starburst Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic properties of the nuclear starburst are [24]: Bolometric luminosity > 5.0×10 10 L ⊙ , absolute K magnitude < −22.5, ionising radiation L Lyc > 10 54 photons/s, total mass in the starburst < 2.5 × 10 8 M ⊙ , CO index > 0.21 and supernova rate ≈ 0.1 yr −1 . Rieke et al [31,32] have pioneered the detailed modelling of this starburst galaxy, and have come repeatedly to the conclusion that stars with masses below a few M ⊙ form much less often in M 82 than in the solar neighbourhood. The argument for a top heavy IMF is basically that the infrared brightness -tracing the bolometric luminosity -is too high for the (dynamically measured) stellar mass, if one assumes a IMF similar to the field star IMF of Scalo [37].…”
Section: Starburst Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He also suggested that extinction corrections in M82 made by others were too high, and this made it appear like M82 had a truncated IMF when really it didn't. Satyapal (1995) indeed found low extinction in M82 from Paβ/Brγ, which gave A V = 2 − 12 mag compared to 25 mag in Rieke et al (1980). Satyapal then got a K-band luminosity 3 times lower than Rieke et al, and saw no need for IMF truncation.…”
Section: Introduction: History Of Starburst Imfsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The nearby starburst galaxy, M82, was one of the best cases. Rieke et al (1980Rieke et al ( , 1993 modeled M82's gas mass, luminous star mass, rotation curve mass, 2.2 µm flux, Lyman continuum flux, CO index for supergiants, and the Brα/Brγ ratio, giving an extinction A V = 25 mag. They concluded that only the usual IMF models with lower mass limits M L > 3 − 6 M ⊙ worked.…”
Section: Introduction: History Of Starburst Imfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M 82 is regarded as the archetypical starburst galaxy (Rieke et al 1980). Its distance of only 3.9 Mpc (Sakai & Madore 1999) makes M 82 an excellent laboratory for studying the relevant physical processes connected with starburst activity in detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%