2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The nature of submillimetre and highly star-forming galaxies in the EAGLE simulation

Abstract: We exploit eagle, a cosmological hydrodynamical simulation, to reproduce the selection of the observed sub-millimeter (submm) galaxy population by selecting the model galaxies at z ≥ 1 with mock submm fluxes S 850µm ≥ 1 mJy (computed in post processing using radiative transfer techniques). There is a reasonable agreement between the galaxies within this sample and the properties of the observed submm population, such as their star formation rates (SFRs) at z < 3, redshift distribution and many integrated galax… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

15
89
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
15
89
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To select a sample of galaxies from the EAGLE model we use the largest volume in the simulation set -Ref-L0100N1504, which is a 100 cMpc on-a-side periodic box (total volume 10 6 cMpc 3 ). However, we note that the volume of even the largest published EAGLE simulation is too small to include significant numbers of high-redshift galaxies with star-formation rates (or predicted 870-µm flux densities) comparable to those seen in AS2UDS (McAlpine et al 2019). As a result, to match the observations as closely as possible, but also provide a statistical sample for our comparison, we select all 9,431 galaxies from EAGLE with SFR > 10 M yr −1 and z > 0.25, but also isolate the 100 most strongly star-forming galaxies in the redshift range z = 1.8-3.4 (the 16-84th percentile redshift range of our survey).…”
Section: Testing Against Spectroscopic Redshiftsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To select a sample of galaxies from the EAGLE model we use the largest volume in the simulation set -Ref-L0100N1504, which is a 100 cMpc on-a-side periodic box (total volume 10 6 cMpc 3 ). However, we note that the volume of even the largest published EAGLE simulation is too small to include significant numbers of high-redshift galaxies with star-formation rates (or predicted 870-µm flux densities) comparable to those seen in AS2UDS (McAlpine et al 2019). As a result, to match the observations as closely as possible, but also provide a statistical sample for our comparison, we select all 9,431 galaxies from EAGLE with SFR > 10 M yr −1 and z > 0.25, but also isolate the 100 most strongly star-forming galaxies in the redshift range z = 1.8-3.4 (the 16-84th percentile redshift range of our survey).…”
Section: Testing Against Spectroscopic Redshiftsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Finally, in Fig. 7, we overlay the predicted redshift distribution for SMGs with S 850 ≥ 1 mJy from the EAGLE simulation (McAlpine et al 2019). The median redshift for the EAGLE SMGs is z = 2.4 ± 0.1, with a sharp decrease above z ∼ 2.5, driven in part by an increasing dust temperature in sources at higher redshifts.…”
Section: Redshift Distributionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations