1980
DOI: 10.1159/000232481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Nature of Secretory Agglutinins and Aggregating Factors

Abstract: Secretory conglutinin-like factor (SKF) reacts directly with an unknown surface component of some, but not all, oral gram-positive organisms. The absorption of SKF by bacteria is EDTA-sensitive and cannot be blocked with immunoglobulins. High levels of SKF in EDTA extracts of washed salivary sediment reveal the direct in vivo reaction of SKF with oral bacteria. Mixed aggregation with alexinated erythrocytes showed the SKF corresponds to the secretory bacterial aggregating factor (SBAF) for Streptococcus mutans… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

1980
1980
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(10 reference statements)
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was heat stable at 90:'C whereas secretory IgA is not [25] and, as shown earlier [9], the agglutinin reacting with Streptococcus rnutuns T H 16 requires calcium ions to be active while secretory IgA does not. The agglutinin subunit had a molecular weight of the same order as secretory IgA but the agglutinin band in the SDS/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis did not show identity to the secretory IgA run in parallel.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was heat stable at 90:'C whereas secretory IgA is not [25] and, as shown earlier [9], the agglutinin reacting with Streptococcus rnutuns T H 16 requires calcium ions to be active while secretory IgA does not. The agglutinin subunit had a molecular weight of the same order as secretory IgA but the agglutinin band in the SDS/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis did not show identity to the secretory IgA run in parallel.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The main difference is a lower proline and a higher serine and threonine content in the agglutinin. Eggert [25] reported a heat stability for his salivary agglutinin up to 60°C for 30 min, whereas in this study agglutinin could tolerate 90 'C for 30 min without any noteworthy loss of aggregating activity. The divergences in results indicate that the studied preparations differ in composition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other studies, Kuhlman et al (13) showed that serum MBP binds to mannose-rich 0-poly-+ Adsorbed BAL saccharides on the surface ofwild-type Salmonella montevideo ;orbance 1.0 has been extensively studied in the context of oral microbes BAL or with 3 and saliva (22,31), and there appear to be several types of affinity chrosalivary proteins that can mediate bacterial agglutination. e was adjusted Among these is a group of nonimmunoglobulin, nonmucous ubations were salivary agglutinins with conglutinin-like activity (32,33 (3) and are also consistent with protein biochemical studies that indie calcium-in-cate that SP-D is assembled as tetramers of trimers, similar to )served sugar bovine conglutinin (2,4). Although there are differences in th SP-D and apparent carbohydrate specificity (3), both proteins can also iich are effecmediate complement-dependent erythrocyte agglutination s (30 The efficient labeling of LPS from Rc and Rd mutants (but not from Re mutants or lipid A) and the efficient inhibition of Y1088 agglutination by Rc-LPS strongly implicate core terminal glucose and/or heptose residues in SP-D binding to LPS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These EDTA-sensitive factors are also distinguished from 1 IS IgA by their large molecular size [Hay et al, 1971;Lachmann and Thompson, 1970] be tween 60S and 90S [Eggert, 1977[Eggert, , 1979a.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%