“…Since the distance between the HaP incorporated in the TiO 2 and the TiO 2 nanoparticles is very small, more strongly doped materials such as MAPbBr 3 (Cl) and CsPbBr 3 should have a stronger net electric field compared to the more intrinsic materials (MAPbBr 3 , (FA,MA,Cs)PbBr 3 ). [39,40] If these two properties, alone or together, are the ones that are responsible for the observed hysteresis in MAPbI 3 -based devices [and in (FA,MA,Cs)PbBr 3 as seen in Figure 1], it can indicate that ion migration is more dominant in the mixed cation layers than in the single cation devices, possibly because of a less closely packed lattice in the former (where a c = 6.00 Å) than in the MAPbBr 3 (cf. To visualize this, we plot in Figure 4 the normalized EBIC collection efficiency versus the mp-TiO 2 \HaP area for the four different HaP devices that were considered in Figure 2.…”