The nature and sources of liberal international order

Abstract

Debates about the future of relations among the advanced industrial countries after the Cold War hinge on theories about the sources of international political order. Realism advances the most defined—and pessimistic—answers drawing on theories of anarchy, balance, and hegemony. But these theories are not able to explain the origins and continuing stability of relations among the United States and its European and Asian partners. This article develops a theory of liberal international order that captures its major structures, institutions, and practices. Distinctive features mark postwar liberal order—co-binding security institutions, penetrated American hegemony, semi-sovereign great powers, economic openness, and civic identity. It is these multifaceted and interlocking features of Western liberal order that give it a durability and significance.

The External Dimension of EU Justice and Home Affairs: Tools, Processes, Outcomes

“…Identities/orders intersections are important for the ENP partly because a sustainable political order requires some kind of collective identity, and partly because change in the latter often alters political order. The converse is true (Deudney and Ikenberry, 1999;Hall, 1999;Neumann, 1999). But there are degrees in collective identity formation.…”

When Interdependence Produces Conflict: EU–Russia Energy Relations as a Security Dilemma

“…22 In situations of complex interdependence, it is difficult to measure just who is more dependent on whom because dependence is dispersed along many different dimensions. 23 This situation minimizes the risk that one state will use the other's dependence as a tool of political leverage because it itself may be dependent on that other state in a different relationship. The American -EU relationship is characterized by complex interdependence.…”

Crisis, What Crisis? Liberal Order Building and World Order Conventions

“…11 This form of 'structural liberalism' is presented in international theory as an alternative to political realist theories of international order. 12 It is a theory of order specific to international institutions, offering an alternative to realist theories describing 'order' as the maintenance of the balance of power between great powers in the system, or as the preponderance of the military or economic might of the hegemonic state in the system.…”