1982
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1982.tb00079.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The nature and measurement of work involvement

Abstract: The construct ' work involvement ' was viewed as having three dimensions: job involvement, or psychological identification with the position or job occupied; specialization involvement, or psychological identification with the career or specialization of which the present job is a part; and importance ofperformance to seyesteem, an individual difference variable akin to the Protestant ethic. Two studies of professional Army officers are described (n = 100, and n = 384). Factor analysis of questionnaire items s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
3

Year Published

1986
1986
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The construct being assessed (e.g.`work should be considered central to life' or`the most important things that happen in life involve work') may re¯ect stable personality traits more than attitudes which would be aected by workplace factors. This scale assesses involvement with work in general (Kanungo, 1982) as opposed to involvement with a particular job or position (Jans, 1982). Thus, it seems reasonable in retrospect that family factors would be more associated with work involvement, whereas, perceived job quality would be more related to one's job involvement (which is based on one's current job perceptions).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The construct being assessed (e.g.`work should be considered central to life' or`the most important things that happen in life involve work') may re¯ect stable personality traits more than attitudes which would be aected by workplace factors. This scale assesses involvement with work in general (Kanungo, 1982) as opposed to involvement with a particular job or position (Jans, 1982). Thus, it seems reasonable in retrospect that family factors would be more associated with work involvement, whereas, perceived job quality would be more related to one's job involvement (which is based on one's current job perceptions).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When job involvement is more closely examined, one finds different definitions by Allport (1943) Lodahl and Kejner (1965), Pinder (1984) and Reitz and Jewell (1979). The same argument is applied in the case of work involvement when the definitions by Jans (1982), Kanungo (1982a), and Newton and Keenan (1983) are revisited. Also, in the case of career commitment, different definitions were developed by Amatea, Cross, Clark & Bobby (1986), Blau (1988) and Greenhaus (1971).…”
Section: Lack Of a Comparative Theoretical Basis Between Commitment Focimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vorige ondersoeke ten opsigte van werkbetrokkenheid het soms nie daarin geslaag om tussen drie moontlike interpretasies van die konsep te onderskei nie of om die feit te erken dat dit moontlik multi-dimensioneel mag wees nie (Jans, 1982). Jans (1982) beskou werkbetrokkenheid daarom as drie-dimensioneel: werkbetrokkenheid, of psigologiese identi¢sering met die posisie wat beklee word; spesialisasie-betrokkenheid, of psigologiese identi¢sering met die loopbaan of spesialisasie waarvan die werk 'n deel vorm; en die belangrikheid van prestasie vir selfagting, 'n individuele verskilveranderlike wat verwant is aan die Protestantse werksetiek.…”
Section: Werkbetrokkenheidunclassified
“…Jans (1982) beskou werkbetrokkenheid daarom as drie-dimensioneel: werkbetrokkenheid, of psigologiese identi¢sering met die posisie wat beklee word; spesialisasie-betrokkenheid, of psigologiese identi¢sering met die loopbaan of spesialisasie waarvan die werk 'n deel vorm; en die belangrikheid van prestasie vir selfagting, 'n individuele verskilveranderlike wat verwant is aan die Protestantse werksetiek. Sy studies het getoon dat hierdie drie houdings wel van mekaar onderskei kan word.…”
Section: Werkbetrokkenheidunclassified