2013
DOI: 10.2147/ceg.s40259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The natural history of ulcerative colitis in a pediatric population: a follow-up population- based cohort study

Abstract: BackgroundThe natural history of ulcerative colitis (UC) has been poorly studied in children.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study in children diagnosed with UC with a follow-up. The diagnosis of UC was based on clinical, radiologic, endoscopic, and histologic examinations. We estimated the occurrence of colectomy, proctitis, and extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs) at the onset of the diagnosis and at the end of the study period.ResultsWe identified 115 UC patients between 1986 and 2003 with a mean age a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

11
29
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
11
29
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The proportion of children with UC presenting with UP at diagnosis in our study (25%) is consistent with another population-based study reporting also 25% of UP,3 a geographically derived incidence cohort from Denmark reporting the same rate of 25% of UP (18) and from a study through a tertiary paediatric gastroenterology centre reporting a rate of 29% 11. The frequency of UP was much lower in other paediatric cohorts performed in gastroenterological centres with, respectively, 10% and 4% 12 18.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proportion of children with UC presenting with UP at diagnosis in our study (25%) is consistent with another population-based study reporting also 25% of UP,3 a geographically derived incidence cohort from Denmark reporting the same rate of 25% of UP (18) and from a study through a tertiary paediatric gastroenterology centre reporting a rate of 29% 11. The frequency of UP was much lower in other paediatric cohorts performed in gastroenterological centres with, respectively, 10% and 4% 12 18.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…At diagnosis, the frequency of UP varies widely among studies, and ranges from 4% to 29% in the paediatric population 3 5 7 11–17. The proportion of children with UC presenting with UP at diagnosis in our study (25%) is consistent with another population-based study reporting also 25% of UP,3 a geographically derived incidence cohort from Denmark reporting the same rate of 25% of UP (18) and from a study through a tertiary paediatric gastroenterology centre reporting a rate of 29% 11.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to our former publication in this area, we here (a) report an updated analytic approach by including the use of medication as time‐varying covariates in the results for colectomies, (b) include data for a prolonged study period of nationwide paediatric and adolescent patients with UC and (c) examine whether use of corticosteroids is really ceased after introduction of anti‐TNFα therapy. The 5‐year proportion of colectomies in paediatric and adolescent patients with UC have varied both before and after the introduction of anti‐TNFα, ranging from 6% to 20% . Gower‐Rousseau et al reported a 5‐year colectomy proportion of 20% after the diagnosis in a French paediatric cohort of patients with UC in the period 1988‐2002.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gower‐Rousseau et al reported a 5‐year colectomy proportion of 20% after the diagnosis in a French paediatric cohort of patients with UC in the period 1988‐2002. Malaty et al reported an approximated colectomy proportion of 14% within a 5‐year period in a US single‐centre paediatric cohort study before the era of anti‐TNFα. A previous Danish study found a 1‐year surgery proportion of 2.4% based on 62 paediatric patients less than 15 years of age in the period 1998‐2009 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation