The natural history of the Tineina /

Stainton, H. T

doi:10.5962/bhl.title.97033

Cited by 10 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, Sattler & Tremewan (1974, 1978) rejected the generic classification of Căpuşe and Falkovitsh to maintain the uniformity of the large genus Coleophora , as it has been regarded by several earlier authors (e.g. Herrich‐Schäffer 1847–1855; Zeller 1849; Stainton 1859; von Heinemann & Wocke 1877), and this subsequently became again widely accepted (e.g. Emmet et al.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Early authors tried to subdivide Coleophora into ‘sections’ or ‘species groups’, considering antennal morphology and wing‐pattern elements (Zeller 1839, 1849; Herrich‐Schäffer 1847–1855; Stainton 1859; von Heinemann & Wocke 1877; Spuler 1910). It appears that none of these early groups is monophyletic, except for the frischella group originally recognised by Stainton (1859; group I, subgroup II). Barasch (1934) was the first to analyse the morphology of genitalia for coleophoran systematics and confirmed the frischella (= ‘ spissicornis ’) group, which was later revised by Landry & Wright (1993) and Stübner (2007).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Morphology of adult Coleophoridae is very uniform. First attempts to classify Coleophora into manageable units date back to Zeller (1839, 1849), Herrich‐Schäffer (1847–1855), Stainton (1859), and von Heinemann & Wocke (1877), who suggested numerical systems for Palearctic species using antennae and wing characters. Toll (1953, 1962) adopted the idea of a numerical concept and additionally considered structures of genitalia.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Molecular phylogeny, larval case architecture, host–plant associations and classification of European Coleophoridae (Lepidoptera)

Bauer¹,

Stübner²,

Neinhuis³

et al. 2012

Zoologica Scripta

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bauer, F., Stübner, A., Neinhuis, C. & Nuss, M. (2012). Molecular phylogeny, larval case architecture, host–plant associations and classification of European Coleophoridae (Lepidoptera). —Zoologica Scripta, 41, 248–265. Several attempts based on adult morphology have aimed at classifying the megadiverse Coleophoridae, either by defining species groups or by splitting the large genus Coleophora into many smaller genera. A previous cladistic analysis focussing on larvae suggests monophyly of some case type groups as well as host–plant associations with a preference for certain plant tissues and growth forms. Here, a first molecular phylogeny for Coleophoridae is presented to test these partly contradicting hypotheses. Bayesian statistics is applied to different partitioning strategies of a COI + wingless data set (1815 bp) for 105 European species, revealing eight monophyletic species groups. A broader defined Coleophora with internal groups is better supported than the division into many genera. GoniodomaZeller, 1849 syn. rev. and Metriotes Herrich‐Schäffer, 1853 syn. n. are nested within Coleophora Hübner, 1822. Seven species are transferred to Coleophora: C. auroguttella (Zeller, 1849) comb. rev., C. limoniella Stainton, 1884 comb. rev., C. millierella (Ragonot, 1882) comb. n., C. nemesi (Căpuşe, 1970) comb. n., C. sinica (Li & Zheng, 2002) comb. n. (from Goniodoma) as well as C. jaeckhi (Baldizzone, 1985) comb. n. and C. lutarea (Haworth, 1828) comb. n. (from Metriotes). None of the formerly suggested case types is synapomorphic for any of the recovered clades. In contrast, cases built from glossy silk that turns black or dark brown is synapomorphic for the vibicella group. Some clades have radiated on certain plant taxa along with a specialisation in specific tissues, for example, the clade containing the saturatella (leaf miners) and frischella (seed miners) groups is associated with Fabaceae, the albella group (seed miners) with Caryophyllales and the serpylletorum group (leaf miners) with Lamiaceae. Calculating an index of host specificity for all studied species confirms significant differences between seed and leaf feeders on herbaceous plants, but not between leaf feeders on herbaceous and woody plants.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Molecular phylogeny, larval case architecture, host–plant associations and classification of European Coleophoridae (Lepidoptera)

Bauer¹,

Stübner²,

Neinhuis³

et al. 2012

Zoologica Scripta

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Anal fork present. SD1 of abdominal segment VIII in front of spiracle (Braun 1930;Freeman 1967;Keifer 1932Keifer , 1936McLeod 1966;Meyrick 1895;Opler 1974;Stainton 1865;Stevens et al 1978).…”

Section: Terminology and Nomenclaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Revision of Holarctic Teleiodini (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)

Lee¹,

Brown²

2008

Zootaxa

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The 25 genera of Teleiodini (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) occurring in the Holarctic Region are revised. A new genus and new species, Arcutelphusa talladega, are described from Alabama and Mississippi, United States. Evippe Chambers (1873a) is synonymized with Agnippe Chambers (1872a), Hapalosaris Meyrick (1917) is synonymized with Coleotechnites Chambers (1880b), and Laris Omelko (1988) is synonymized with Parastenolechia Kanazawa (1985). Telphusa is restricted to three species, and Teleiodes is restricted to four species. A key to genera and a checklist of species, which includes 28 new combinations, are provided. Each generic treatment includes descriptions of imagos, including venation and genitalia, and immature stages so far as known, larval hosts, diversity and distribution, and illustrations of selected species.

show abstract