1972
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-65066-6_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Natural History of Invertebrate Visual Pigments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is evidence that the photopigments in many invertebrate photoreceptors have two thermostable forms or states that are photointerconvertible (see reviews by Goldsmith, 1972 ;Hamdorf, 1979). Absorption of photons by the state called rhodopsin is primarily responsible for the generation of the receptor potential (Hamdorf et al ., 1968); however, absorption of photons by the other state, metarhodopsin, can also affect the membrane potential, notably when the membrane has previously been depolarized by a massive conversion of rhodopsin to metarhodopsin (Hochstein et al ., 1973) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence that the photopigments in many invertebrate photoreceptors have two thermostable forms or states that are photointerconvertible (see reviews by Goldsmith, 1972 ;Hamdorf, 1979). Absorption of photons by the state called rhodopsin is primarily responsible for the generation of the receptor potential (Hamdorf et al ., 1968); however, absorption of photons by the other state, metarhodopsin, can also affect the membrane potential, notably when the membrane has previously been depolarized by a massive conversion of rhodopsin to metarhodopsin (Hochstein et al ., 1973) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research has clearly established that the two visual pigment states R (rhodopsin) and M (metarhodopsin) are expressed in the electrically measurable cell responses (review Hamdorf, 1979). The present consensus is that rhodopsin photosensitivity is the only determinant for the spectral sensitivity of the dark adapted cell at low light intensities (Goldsmith, 1972;Atzmon et al, 1978;Strong and Lisman, 1978). High light intensities of a selected wavelength range eliciting a high rhodopsin conversion rate versus little metarhodopsin conversion result in prolonged depolarizing afterpotentials (PDA); wavelengths inducing a high metarhodopsin conversion rate annihilate the PDA (barnacle: Hochstein et al, 1973;blowfly: Hamdorf and Razmjoo, 1977;Muijser et al, 1975;dronefly: Tsukahara et al, 1977;Limulus: Nolte and Brown, 1972;Minke et al, 1973).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent experiments of Hsu & Molday (1993) show that isolated light-dependent channels are also affected by Ca2+-calmodulin. The modulation of the channels by Ca2+ may be small under physiological conditions, since perfusion of intact rod outer segments with calmodulin or calmodulin inhibitors seems to have no effect on the lightdependent conductance (Gray-Keller, Polans, Palczewski & Detwiler, 1993;P. B. Detwiler, personal communication).…”
Section: Bleachesmentioning
confidence: 99%