1995
DOI: 10.2307/5842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Natural History of Inbreeding and Outbreeding: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. British Ecological Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Animal Ecology. This content downloaded from 176.61.136.2 on Thu, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The selective breeding of animals has led to new breeds of domestic animals, genetically suited to specific desirable tasks or traits. In domestic animals, inbreeding often results in a trade-off where a desirable trait is heightened or fixed but at the risk of inadvertently selecting undesirable traits or reducing overall fitness [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selective breeding of animals has led to new breeds of domestic animals, genetically suited to specific desirable tasks or traits. In domestic animals, inbreeding often results in a trade-off where a desirable trait is heightened or fixed but at the risk of inadvertently selecting undesirable traits or reducing overall fitness [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While many managers are familiar with the concept of genetic rescue, uncertainties about the relative risks and probability of success have limited its consideration in conservation planning. Early literature warned of the potential negative consequences of mixing formerly isolated populations, most notably the reduction in offspring vigor from outbreeding depression (Templeton, 1986; Thornhill, 1993). While outbreeding depression has been documented in some scenarios (e.g., Côte et al, 2014; Goldberg et al, 2005; Huff et al, 2011), more recent meta‐analyses suggest the threat can be minimal and negative outcomes are often predictable.…”
Section: Genetic Rescue—current Knowledge and Remaining Uncertainties...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While many managers are familiar with the concept of genetic rescue, uncertainties about the relative risks and probability of success have limited its consideration in conservation planning. Early literature warned of the potential negative consequences of mixing formerly isolated populations, most notably the reduction in offspring vigor from outbreeding depression (Templeton, 1986;Thornhill, 1993).…”
Section: Is Genetic Rescue Likely To Benefit Populations?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the environmental and social factors that correlate with having related parents may produce spurious associations between autozygosity and disease phenotypes. However, experimental studies in nonhuman organisms that are free of social and environmental confounding show effects of autozygosity on several phenotypes 15,[21][22][23][24][25] , suggesting that the observations in humans may be at least partially of genetic origin.Here, we describe the patterns of consanguinity and examine the effect of autozygosity on disease risk across the phenotypic spectrum in two cohorts: the Genes & Health cohort, a population-based study of self-reported British Bangladeshi and British Pakistani individuals, and in UK Biobank individuals genetically inferred to have European and South Asian ancestries. We show that subsetting association analyses to highly consanguineous individuals better controls for social and environmental confounding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the environmental and social factors that correlate with having related parents may produce spurious associations between autozygosity and disease phenotypes. However, experimental studies in nonhuman organisms that are free of social and environmental confounding show effects of autozygosity on several phenotypes 15,[21][22][23][24][25] , suggesting that the observations in humans may be at least partially of genetic origin.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%