2014
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-397940-7.00008-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Natural Histories of Species and Their Genomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(98 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Amanita inopinata closely resembles the EM Amanita with respect to its set of PCW degrading enzymes, although this species is not associated with EM hosts, does not form EM structures in nature or in culture, and appears nested within a clade of litter degraders ( Wolfe, Tulloss, et al. 2012 ; Hess and Pringle 2014 ). While losses and reductions of PCW-degrading enzymes define the EM Amanita , an EM Amanita cannot be defined by the absence of PCW degrading enzymes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Amanita inopinata closely resembles the EM Amanita with respect to its set of PCW degrading enzymes, although this species is not associated with EM hosts, does not form EM structures in nature or in culture, and appears nested within a clade of litter degraders ( Wolfe, Tulloss, et al. 2012 ; Hess and Pringle 2014 ). While losses and reductions of PCW-degrading enzymes define the EM Amanita , an EM Amanita cannot be defined by the absence of PCW degrading enzymes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…guessowii (from this point forward discussed as “ A. muscaria ”), the AS species Amanita inopinata and Amanita thiersii , and the AS outgroup Volvariella volvaceae . The natural history of each species is described more fully by ( Hess and Pringle 2014 ). We have previously shown transposable element (TE) expansions in two out of three of these EM species (but also the asymbiotic A. thiersii ), suggesting that even within this single genus, distinct evolutionary processes may be influencing the architecture of different genomes ( Hess et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in the genus Epipactis (Selosse et al, 2004; see references above). Yet, phylogenies support that ECM fungi have evolved from soil saprotrophic fungi (Hess & Pringle, 2014;Kohler et al, 2015), but: (1) these analyses did not consider endophytic species or status; and (2) endophytism may just be the intermediary step on the way from saprotrophic to ECM conditions. From this step, endophytism may either secondarily disappear or persist in extant ECM species.…”
Section: Endophytism In Other Ecm Fungimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent phylogeny documents a single origin of symbiosis within the Amanita ; asymbiotic Amanita form a strongly supported clade basal to a monophyletic clade of symbiotic species (Wolfe et al ., ). Comparative genomics of EM and SAP Amanita reveal large‐scale losses of carbohydrate‐active enzymes from symbiotic genomes (Nagendran et al ., ; Wolfe et al ., ; Chaib De Mares et al ., ; Hess & Pringle, ). The result appears to be a general one; plant cell wall degrading enzymes are frequently lost after fungi become obligately dependent on plants for carbon (Martin et al ., , ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%