2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2008.05.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The natural force density method for the shape finding of taut structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach is known as the generalized FDM formulation based on FEM described in literatures [8,9,[16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Fdm Formulation Based On Femmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach is known as the generalized FDM formulation based on FEM described in literatures [8,9,[16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Fdm Formulation Based On Femmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The various formulation of force density modes are proposed and explained in papers [18,19] and commercial software (Forten 4000, Easy, Rhinomembrane [16,17]) by their unique methodologies. The relationship between force density and equilibrium equation of system may be linear and nonlinear with respect to the element length.…”
Section: Linear and Nonlinear Shape Finding Analysis According To Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The designer must therefore obtain the initial equilibrium configuration, taking into account how the system is assembled in practice and the geometric constraints imposed. Although little attention has been paid in the literature to the shape-finding of the catenary system, it is a well-known and challenging problem in the design of other cable structures, such as light large-area roofs or cable-supported bridges [21][22][23][24][25][26]. As pointed out in [27,28], the initial configuration of the catenary can strongly influence the results of the dynamic simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of shape-finding methods can be found in [21]. The non-linear displacement method [22,23] and the force density method [24][25][26] are the two most commonly used formulations. The method proposed in this work can be considered a variation of the non-linear dis-placement method, and even though it is a general method, we applied it to finding the initial configuration of a railway catenary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is represented by the force density method derived from special discretization and linearization techniques (Schek, 1974). Although this method enables fast determination of equilibrium surfaces, it should be pointed out that additional iterative procedures are inevitable when it is used to model minimal surface forms (Maurin and Motro, 1998;Pauletti and Pimenta, 2008), and thus some of its attractiveness is lost. Unlike the preceding two methods, in the dynamic equilibrium methods (e.g., dynamic relaxation method (DRM)), a steady equilibrium shape for an initially unbalanced structure is achieved by simulating a damped vibration process over time .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%