2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-019-03285-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The national system of researchers in Mexico: implications of publication incentives for researchers in social sciences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…for its Spanish acronym). This is a system of monthly granted bonuses calculated according to an ex‐post peer review which provides the most prestigious local recognition for national researchers (Sandoval‐Romero & Larivière, 2020). In our sample, 71.1% of interviewees are members (12.5% level Candidate, 31.3% level 1, 31.3% level 2%, and 25% level 3), while 28.9% are not.…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for its Spanish acronym). This is a system of monthly granted bonuses calculated according to an ex‐post peer review which provides the most prestigious local recognition for national researchers (Sandoval‐Romero & Larivière, 2020). In our sample, 71.1% of interviewees are members (12.5% level Candidate, 31.3% level 1, 31.3% level 2%, and 25% level 3), while 28.9% are not.…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decade an assessment of research productivity and impact using various performance indicators has become common (Glanzel et al, 2016;King 2004). One of such widely used approaches is scientometrics, part of science and technology policy in many countries, with dedicated international associations, journals, and conferences (Sandoval-Romero et al, 2019;Guskov et al, 2016;Heilig et al, 2015). The term «scientometrics» (naukometriya) was created by the Russian scientist Nalimov in 1969, and means «measuring the science».…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the outcomes of higher education include science popularization activities, and higher education activities increases the spread impacts and effectiveness of science popularization; for instance, by organizing various science and technology related competitions, universities promote students’ interests in sciences so that the influence of science popularization activities increases [ 15 , 16 ]. In addition, some elements of higher education, such as the latest research hotspot in academia, the key persons in research fields, the supportive actions or regulations of universities, etc., are more likely to guide the development direction of science popularization, and to enhance the authoritativeness of science popularization [ 17 – 20 ]. It is also found that the experimental research results in universities can be directly applied in science popularization activities, and then make positive effects [ 21 , 22 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%