2020
DOI: 10.1177/0020764020907941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The National Mental Health Survey of India (2016): Prevalence, socio-demographic correlates and treatment gap of mental morbidity

Abstract: Background: Recognizing the need for good quality, scientific and reliable information for strengthening mental health policies and programmes, the National Mental Health Survey (NMHS) of India was implemented by National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bangalore, in the year 2015–2016. Aim: To estimate the prevalence, socio-demographic correlates and treatment gap of mental morbidity in a representative population of India. Methods: NMHS was conducted across 12 Indian states where trai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
90
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison of our findings with those of the National Mental Health Survey (NMHS)[ 23 ] shows that psychiatric morbidity of common mental illnesses may be higher in our study (40.5%) than the estimated prevalence of 10% in the NMHS. [ 24 ] It can be argued that the significantly higher prevalence of psychiatric morbidity in the present study compared to the NMHS may be due to the use of different sampling methods and use screening instruments (whereas NMHS employed Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview), but the screening instruments have been found to have high sensitivity and specificity against the diagnosis made by mental health professionals. [ 25 26 ] Thus, the difference in the prevalence rates cannot be completely attributed to the difference in the methodology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A comparison of our findings with those of the National Mental Health Survey (NMHS)[ 23 ] shows that psychiatric morbidity of common mental illnesses may be higher in our study (40.5%) than the estimated prevalence of 10% in the NMHS. [ 24 ] It can be argued that the significantly higher prevalence of psychiatric morbidity in the present study compared to the NMHS may be due to the use of different sampling methods and use screening instruments (whereas NMHS employed Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview), but the screening instruments have been found to have high sensitivity and specificity against the diagnosis made by mental health professionals. [ 25 26 ] Thus, the difference in the prevalence rates cannot be completely attributed to the difference in the methodology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The mean ± SD of CPDI was 20.66±12.03, with 95% CI as 20.18-21.15, with a median of 18 and a range of 4-98. The interquartile range was 14 (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26). There were 1,830 (77.2%) respondents with low or no stress, and the rest 541 (22.8%) had significant stress.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…order to be 0.5% in India. 1 Persons with SMI suffer significant disability, with a substantial impact on social and occupational functioning. Livelihood and employment are important in the process of recovery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%