The National Emergency Medicine Fourth-year Student (M4) Examinations: Updates and Performance

Heitz, Corey; Lawson, Luan; Beeson, Michael S.; Miller, Emily S.

doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.06.072

Cited by 1 publication

(3 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Similar to prior years, the most common study populations were medical students (21/75; 28%) and residents (48/75; 64%) . Interestingly, this year only one study addressing medical students was highlighted for excellence, in contrast to prior years.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 92%

“…Three of these studies with an experimental design were highlighted . There was a decline in the number of observational studies (35/75; 47%), compared to 2015 (36/61; 59%), but an increase in the number of studies using survey methodology (19/75; 25%) in 2016 compared to 10 of 61, 16% in 2015, and 0% in 2014. It should be noted that all survey studies in this review drew data from participants from multiple institutions per the predetermined selection criteria.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Several prominent topics of study in 2016 were similar to 2015, including technology, simulation, and assessment . Although still a common topic, the frequency of assessment dropped off substantially from 66% of articles in 2015 to 29% in 2016.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Critical Appraisal of Emergency Medicine Educational Research: The Best Publications of 2016

Dubosh

Jordan

Yarris

et al. 2018

AEM Education and Training

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: The objectives were to critically appraise the emergency medicine (EM) medical education literature published in 2016 and review the highest-quality quantitative and qualitative studies. Methods: A search of the English language literature in 2016 querying MEDLINE, Scopus, Education ResourcesInformation Center (ERIC), and PsychInfo identified 510 papers related to medical education in EM. Two reviewers independently screened all of the publications using previously established exclusion criteria. The 25 top-scoring quantitative studies based on methodology and all six qualitative studies were scored by all reviewers using selected scoring criteria that have been adapted from previous installments. The top-scoring articles were highlighted and trends in medical education research were described.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 92%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%