1970
DOI: 10.1037/h0029240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The National Association of School Psychologists: Its development and objectives.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most germane to this special issue, the traditional tethering of school psychology practice to special education identification processes through federal mandates has limited the opportunity to engage in more prevention and early intervention activities aimed at supporting the behavioral and social-emotional needs of students. Although school psychology has a long history of dissatisfaction with a narrow scope of practice (e.g., Farling & Agner, 1979) and standards for training have required a wide range of competencies (National Association of School Psychologists, 2010), practice in the field continues to be dominated by special education assessment and related activities (Castillo, Curtis, & Gelley, 2012). However, as schools face an increasingly stressed and challenged population of students, models that focus on serving one student at a time are becoming less tenable (Doll & Cummings, 2008).…”
Section: Schools and Service Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most germane to this special issue, the traditional tethering of school psychology practice to special education identification processes through federal mandates has limited the opportunity to engage in more prevention and early intervention activities aimed at supporting the behavioral and social-emotional needs of students. Although school psychology has a long history of dissatisfaction with a narrow scope of practice (e.g., Farling & Agner, 1979) and standards for training have required a wide range of competencies (National Association of School Psychologists, 2010), practice in the field continues to be dominated by special education assessment and related activities (Castillo, Curtis, & Gelley, 2012). However, as schools face an increasingly stressed and challenged population of students, models that focus on serving one student at a time are becoming less tenable (Doll & Cummings, 2008).…”
Section: Schools and Service Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1969, the National Association of School Psychologists (NASP) was born, which gave emphasis to nondoctorallevel school psychology practitioners (Farling & Agner, 1979 1954, supported two levels of training (nondoctoral and doctoral) and agreed on definition, functions, qualifications, levels of positions, safeguards, and general principles for school psychology training and practice. It seemed to endorse the scientist-practitioner model (Cutts, 1955, see p. 155) and value research (see pp.…”
Section: Differences Between Nondoctoral and Doctoral Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%