2009
DOI: 10.3155/1047-3289.59.5.579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The National Ambient Air Monitoring Strategy: Rethinking the Role of National Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assessment considered, for example, the number of sites within a geographic area, how PM correlated among those sites, and whether the sites were within an Scheffe et al, 2009) and STN sites; reducing carbon blanks from 10% to 5%; and eliminating carbon dynamic blanks currently at 5%. Implementation of recommendations is scheduled for early 2015 if approved and after all stakeholders have input.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The assessment considered, for example, the number of sites within a geographic area, how PM correlated among those sites, and whether the sites were within an Scheffe et al, 2009) and STN sites; reducing carbon blanks from 10% to 5%; and eliminating carbon dynamic blanks currently at 5%. Implementation of recommendations is scheduled for early 2015 if approved and after all stakeholders have input.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RTI EDXRF and Chester LabNet laboratories analyze filters from the long-term trend networks (STN and NCORE;EPA, 2005c;Scheffe et al, 2009). Filters collected by California, Oregon, and Texas are analyzed by state and local district laboratories (California Air Resources Board, DRI, and Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, South Coast Air Quality Management District) (Smiley, 2013).…”
Section: Carbonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…57 AlHamdan et al 57 provide an interesting and useful analysis of relationships between surface air quality and spacebased satellite AOD to estimate human exposure. They obtain mostly urban PM data from EPA's Air Quality System (AQS), 58,59 but they neglect the potentially more useful PM 2.5 and chemical speciation data from the nonurban Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) 47,60 and the Southeastern Aerosol Research and Characterization (SEARCH) [61][62][63] networks. They correlate PM 2.5 mass with optical depth, although visibility assessments show that light extinction is better represented by a weighted sum of PM 2.5 sulfate, nitrate, organic carbon, elemental carbon, and soil dust.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 93% of IMPROVE sites are located in nonurban national parks and wilderness areas, representing regional-scale (100 -1000 km) source influences, whereas the remaining networks are dominated by urban-scale (4 -100 km), neighborhoodscale (0.5-4 km), and some source-oriented (Ͻ ϳ0.5 km) sampling sites. [53][54][55] The nature of EC and BC also has changed through time, largely because of the fleet penetration of better controlled gasoline-and diesel-fueled engines that has substantially lowered soot emissions. 56,57 …”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%