2016
DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2016.1231121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The National Adult Reading Test: restandardisation against the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Fourth edition

Abstract: Since publication in 1982, the 50-item National Adult Reading Test (NART; Nelson, 1982; NART-R;Nelson & Willison, 1991) has remained a widely adopted method for estimating premorbid intelligence both for clinical and research purposes. However, the NART has not been standardised against the most recent revisions of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-III; Wechsler, 1997, and WAIS-IV;Wechsler, 2008). Our objective, therefore, was to produce reliable standardised estimates of WAIS-IV IQ from the NART. Ni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
73
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(8 reference statements)
2
73
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mood was assessed via a self-report questionnaire, the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II; Beck et al ., 1996). Patients were also administered the National Adult Reading Test (NART (Bright et al ., 2016), and their predicted pre-morbid full scale IQ was calculated. The NART is an established measure of premorbid intelligence and serves as a surrogate of cognitive reserve, with the benefit of offering greater variance than years of education in a homogenous sample (Stern et al ., 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mood was assessed via a self-report questionnaire, the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II; Beck et al ., 1996). Patients were also administered the National Adult Reading Test (NART (Bright et al ., 2016), and their predicted pre-morbid full scale IQ was calculated. The NART is an established measure of premorbid intelligence and serves as a surrogate of cognitive reserve, with the benefit of offering greater variance than years of education in a homogenous sample (Stern et al ., 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the limitations of the NART, and most other methods for estimating premorbid ability, is that the estimates are most valid for estimating premorbid IQ and not other, more specific, cognitive abilities (e.g., attention, memory, executive function, psychomotor function, visuospatial ability and language). For example, past research shows the NART is particularly problematic in estimating premorbid executive function (Bright et al, ). Therefore, the current results should not be used to facilitate interpretation of decline in more specific cognitive domains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the current results should not be used to facilitate interpretation of decline in more specific cognitive domains. Further, it has been posited that reading tests such as the NART may be best as an estimate of premorbid function for intelligence in the average range, and that it overestimates premorbid intelligence for those in the low range and underestimates premorbid intelligence for those in the high range (Bright, Hale, Gooch, Myhill, & VanDerLinde, ). However, these points remain to be assessed in an OSA population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is important because cognitive reserve provides a retrospective estimated baseline for cognitive function (Roldán-Tapia et al 2012), and the degree of cognitive decline can be a function of ADT treatment duration (Nead et al 2016). The National Adult Reading Test (NART), which provides a measure of reading intelligence that is more stable over time than other facets of intelligence, is one example of a relatively simple and easy-to-administer neurocognitive instrument that estimates cognitive reserve (Bright et al 2016). To determine the cognitive performance in PCa survivors on ADT, standardised, objective measures of cognitive domains shown to be affected by ADT should be included (Wefel et al 2011).…”
Section: The Effects Of Androgen Deprivation On Cognitive Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%