2013
DOI: 10.1086/672273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The NASA Exoplanet Archive: Data and Tools for Exoplanet Research

Abstract: We describe the contents and functionality of the NASA Exoplanet Archive, a database and tool set funded by NASA to support astronomers in the exoplanet community. The current content of the database includes interactive tables containing properties of all published exoplanets, Kepler planet candidates, threshold-crossing events, data validation reports and target stellar parameters, light curves from the Kepler and CoRoT missions and from several ground-based surveys, and spectra and radial velocity measureme… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
423
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 658 publications
(430 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
7
423
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to planet catalogs produced by the Kepler team, detailed planet validation has been performed by Lissauer et al (2012Lissauer et al ( , 2014 on mulit-planet systems, and on large samples (1000ʼs) of KOIs by Mullally et al (2015) and Morton et al (2016). The NASA Exoplanet Archive (Akeson et al 2013) hosts a cumulative list of dispositions for every KOI. All of these catalogs combined provide high-quality vetting of the Kepler planet candidate lists.…”
Section: False Positive Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to planet catalogs produced by the Kepler team, detailed planet validation has been performed by Lissauer et al (2012Lissauer et al ( , 2014 on mulit-planet systems, and on large samples (1000ʼs) of KOIs by Mullally et al (2015) and Morton et al (2016). The NASA Exoplanet Archive (Akeson et al 2013) hosts a cumulative list of dispositions for every KOI. All of these catalogs combined provide high-quality vetting of the Kepler planet candidate lists.…”
Section: False Positive Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, we used the Lomb-Scargle (LS; Scargle 1982) approach as implemented by the NASA Exoplanet Archive Periodogram Service 12 (Akeson et al 2013). We looked for periods between 0.05 and 35 days, with the upper limit being set by roughly half the campaign length.…”
Section: Finding Periodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Jupiter mass planets, Reiners & Christensen (2010) predict that the magnetic field will be similar to the Jovian values (about 10G in the polar regions). The data is taken from exoplanet.eu (Schneider et al 2011), and the NASA exoplanet archive (Akeson et al 2013). We only chose exoplanets whose relative radius and mass uncertainties are below 50%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%