2020
DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsaa054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The N170 event-related potential differentiates congruent and incongruent gaze responses in gaze leading

Abstract: To facilitate social interactions, humans need to process the responses that other people make to their actions, including eye movements that could establish joint attention. Here, we investigated the neurophysiological correlates of the processing of observed gaze responses following the participants’ own eye movement. These observed gaze responses could either establish, or fail to establish, joint attention. We implemented a gaze leading paradigm in which participants made a saccade from an on-screen face t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In another study, Latinus et al (2014) used different tasks but the same stimuli—the same participants performed a social task (observing gaze shifts either away or toward the participants) and a nonsocial task (observing left/right gaze shifts)—and found that a greater N170 for gaze aversion was elicited in the right hemisphere for the nonsocial task but not the social task. Stephenson, Edwards, Luri, Renoult, and Bayliss (2020) also investigated the impact of shared-attention context as a modulator of the N170. They found that both when the task was gaze-related and gaze-unrelated, participants showed an enhanced N170 to the onset of averted gaze when the gaze stimulus followed the participant’s antecedent saccade to a peripheral location compared with when the observed gaze direction did not establish shared attention.…”
Section: Early Event-related Potentials: the N170 Edan And N2pcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study, Latinus et al (2014) used different tasks but the same stimuli—the same participants performed a social task (observing gaze shifts either away or toward the participants) and a nonsocial task (observing left/right gaze shifts)—and found that a greater N170 for gaze aversion was elicited in the right hemisphere for the nonsocial task but not the social task. Stephenson, Edwards, Luri, Renoult, and Bayliss (2020) also investigated the impact of shared-attention context as a modulator of the N170. They found that both when the task was gaze-related and gaze-unrelated, participants showed an enhanced N170 to the onset of averted gaze when the gaze stimulus followed the participant’s antecedent saccade to a peripheral location compared with when the observed gaze direction did not establish shared attention.…”
Section: Early Event-related Potentials: the N170 Edan And N2pcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent work points to the importance of the N170 in the establishment of shared attention. Indeed, Stephenson et al (2020) found an enhanced N170 when changes in eye gaze of a stimulus face were in the same direction as the participant, indicating the establishment of shared attention. In both these studies, N170 responses were measured in response to gaze shifts, highlighting that an N170 can be elicited not only by eyes alone, but by a change in the relative contrast between sclera and iris.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Both the N170 and P300 show reliable top-down modulation in response to social context. N170 amplitude is influenced by contexts including facial feature (eye vs. mouth movement) [ 36 ], facial realism (real vs. photographed) [ 37 ], sequence of stimulus presentation (faces preceded by non-face vs. face stimuli) [ 38 ], and presumed intentionality (imagined to be evaluating the viewer vs. someone else) [ 19 , 39 ]. Similar modulations occur at the P300, which is larger to shifts of gaze when participants believe that computer-generated faces are controlled by a real person [ 20 , 40 , 41 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%