1976
DOI: 10.1080/00131727609336214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Myths of Rural School and District Consolidation: Part I

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These factors negated potential savings and economies of size. Sher and Tompkins (1976) suggested, "In most rural areas there is virtually no inherent differences in the operational costs of districts anywhere within the range of 400 to 1,100 students" (p. 98). Their research and investigation indicates that school district consolidation may not be the silver bullet in solving education funding and programming issues in rural areas.…”
Section: Evidence That School District Consolidation Does Not Reduce mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These factors negated potential savings and economies of size. Sher and Tompkins (1976) suggested, "In most rural areas there is virtually no inherent differences in the operational costs of districts anywhere within the range of 400 to 1,100 students" (p. 98). Their research and investigation indicates that school district consolidation may not be the silver bullet in solving education funding and programming issues in rural areas.…”
Section: Evidence That School District Consolidation Does Not Reduce mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sher and Tompkins (1976) claimed, "The most successfully implemented education policy of the past fifty years has been the consolidation of rural schools and school districts" (p.…”
Section: Evidence That School District Consolidation Does Not Reduce mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation