2008
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1121024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Myths and Realities of Correctional Severity: Evidence from the National Corrections Reporting Program on Sentencing Practices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the odds that a felony arrest would result in prison admission increased notably after the early 1980s (Blumstein & Beck 1999;Pfaff 2011aPfaff , 2017Raphael & Stoll 2009Travis et al 2014;Western 2006). Insofar as this shift likely stemmed at least in part from prosecutors' increased proclivity to file felony charges, 8 these findings are consistent with research that highlights prosecutors' vast and unregulated discretionary power, which includes the authority to decide whether to file charges, which charges to file, and which plea bargains to accept (Davis 2008, Stuntz 2011.…”
Section: Debating the Importance Of Sentencing Policy And The Need Fomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, the odds that a felony arrest would result in prison admission increased notably after the early 1980s (Blumstein & Beck 1999;Pfaff 2011aPfaff , 2017Raphael & Stoll 2009Travis et al 2014;Western 2006). Insofar as this shift likely stemmed at least in part from prosecutors' increased proclivity to file felony charges, 8 these findings are consistent with research that highlights prosecutors' vast and unregulated discretionary power, which includes the authority to decide whether to file charges, which charges to file, and which plea bargains to accept (Davis 2008, Stuntz 2011.…”
Section: Debating the Importance Of Sentencing Policy And The Need Fomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that changes in the composition of the prison population, such as the infusion of 8 Pfaff (2011a) analyzed the filing-to-arrest and admission-to-filing ratios separately and found that only the former increased, which he interprets as evidence of the role of prosecutorial discretion (as opposed to sentencing policy) in the prison buildup. However, the filing data on which this analysis relies have a number of important limitations (Kathryn Holt, pers.…”
Section: Debating the Importance Of Sentencing Policy And The Need Fomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It therefore seems plausible that the growth and aging of the prison population is a result of the differential drug involvement of certain cohorts. Indeed, Pollack, Reuter, and Sevigny have also found that little evidence exists that the changes are driven by an increase in sentence length (Pfaff, 2011, 2012, 2013; Raphael and Stoll, 2009, 2013). …”
Section: Prison Agingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of arrests data is driven by two considerations. First, consistent annual incarceration data at the state and cohort level simply do not exist in the United States (see Pfaff, 2011). Second, it is of interest to measure criminality in a broad way and check that the results are robust.…”
Section: Details Of Us Panel Datamentioning
confidence: 99%