The Splintering of Spain 2005
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511497025.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The myth of the maddened crowd: class, culture and space in the revolutionary urbanist project in Barcelona, 1936–1937

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their problem may have been that when deliberating during an assembly many workers were in favor of increasing the working day and the free riders were forced to falsify their real preferences to avoid sanctions. Such decisions were largely based on the anarchists' aversion to modern means of transport, which resulted in the widespread destruction of cars (Carrasco, 1936;Ealham, 2005). 25 Similar views of many other protagonists can be found in Fraser (1979, especially pp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Their problem may have been that when deliberating during an assembly many workers were in favor of increasing the working day and the free riders were forced to falsify their real preferences to avoid sanctions. Such decisions were largely based on the anarchists' aversion to modern means of transport, which resulted in the widespread destruction of cars (Carrasco, 1936;Ealham, 2005). 25 Similar views of many other protagonists can be found in Fraser (1979, especially pp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…33 The committees set up people's tribunals as well as control patrols (groups of armed militiamen who acted as police) (Guillamón, 2012(Guillamón, , p. 15, 2007. The trials held by these tribunals were characterized by their speed (Ealham, 2005;Paz, 2002, pp. 71-72).…”
Section: Revolutionary Terrormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In large cities and provincial capitals, the inefficient central state authorized religious personnel to run reformatories and prisons. 31 In these centres -and in other ostensibly charitable institutions like orphanages and 'domestic service convents' -the clergy validated a series of authoritarian practices, such as dragooning mental patients into attending mass, which intensified anticlerical sentiment. In workers' districts, these establishments acquired a reputation for physical, psychological, and sometimes sexual abuse.…”
Section: Catholicism and State Repressionmentioning
confidence: 99%