1982
DOI: 10.2307/976121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Myth of the Annual Budget

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Congressional tradeoffs between budget authority and outlays thus have come to resemble those within the Executive as a result of the clash of budgetary and fiscal policy demands. Schick (1983) and Caiden (1982Caiden ( , 1984 cite these congressional disputes over the budgetary base and economic assumptions as evidence of a new political context for budgeting in both the Executive and Congress. While we agree with these scholars on the appearance and character of these new forms of budgetary behavior in Congress, such behavior in fact is not unprecedented within the federal budgetary process.…”
Section: Strategic Behavior In the Congressional Budgetary Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Congressional tradeoffs between budget authority and outlays thus have come to resemble those within the Executive as a result of the clash of budgetary and fiscal policy demands. Schick (1983) and Caiden (1982Caiden ( , 1984 cite these congressional disputes over the budgetary base and economic assumptions as evidence of a new political context for budgeting in both the Executive and Congress. While we agree with these scholars on the appearance and character of these new forms of budgetary behavior in Congress, such behavior in fact is not unprecedented within the federal budgetary process.…”
Section: Strategic Behavior In the Congressional Budgetary Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, as we discuss below, many of the "new rules" and other aspects of budgetary behavior cited by Schick (1983) and Caiden (1982Caiden ( , 1984 reflect the appearance within Congress of behavior long characteristic of the Executive branch. Such behavior typically is held in check within the Executive branch by limits on both the duration of debate and the range of issues subject to debate, as well as restrictions on access to the process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent discussions and analyses of the present budgetary"crisis" (e.g., Caiden, 1982), no less than discussion of the presidential management "crisis" (National Academy of Public Administration, 1980) have proceeded, by and large, with weak theoretical underpinnings. Many of the budgetary trends that were discussed above have been noted in this literature; what has been lacking is any analysis of the political incentives and interactions that underpin circumventionist behavior and outcomes.…”
Section: Conclusion: Games Presidents Do Not Playmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 These deficiencies are suggested in statistical analyses (see Fischer and Kamlet, 1983;Kamlet and Mowery, 1983b) and discussed extensively in Caiden (1982), Fisher (1982), and Aaron (1983) Kamlet and Mowery (1983b). 4 Indeed, most formal models of government growth (e.g., Niskanen) do not allow at all for the existence of a strong executive branch politician, analyzing instead the interaction of legislative politician and agency bureaucrats.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The carry-over issue deals with reducing the rigidity of the annual budget, where the year's revenues should strictly support the expenses of the same fiscal year (Caiden, 1982). The complete rigidity in the association of expenses and revenues in the year has side effects.…”
Section: Literature On Budget Carry-overmentioning
confidence: 99%