2006
DOI: 10.2307/25472180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Myth of Linguistic Homogeneity in U.S. College Composition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
85
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, ESL classes, which segregate nonnative English speakers in separate classes, marginalize these students based on language difference. Matsuda (2006) wrote of institutional policies of "linguistic containment" (p. 641) that keep English second language learners and their concerns from mainstream composition classes, and he objected to these policies because they have prevented ESL concerns from entering the consciousness of mainstream composition instructors. However, the use of the term "linguistic containment" also increased tensions around the separation of English second language learners from English first language learners, implying that ESL classes are segregationist and discriminatory.…”
Section: How Does Translingualism Position Second Language Writing Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, ESL classes, which segregate nonnative English speakers in separate classes, marginalize these students based on language difference. Matsuda (2006) wrote of institutional policies of "linguistic containment" (p. 641) that keep English second language learners and their concerns from mainstream composition classes, and he objected to these policies because they have prevented ESL concerns from entering the consciousness of mainstream composition instructors. However, the use of the term "linguistic containment" also increased tensions around the separation of English second language learners from English first language learners, implying that ESL classes are segregationist and discriminatory.…”
Section: How Does Translingualism Position Second Language Writing Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where I have encountered some of the greatest limits on my happy marriage of linguistics and rhetoric is in the move to pedagogy 3 , but even in pedagogical methods the two fields are overlapping more all the time. Those in Rhetorical Genre Studies have typically worked with writers, whether in school or workplace settings, in their primary languages and cultures (a limitation that seems to be beginning to change, with pushes from such scholars as Matsuda, 2006;and Tardy, 2006). The two disciplines have often applied their theories to different instructional contexts-students, teachers, and institutional settings-and as a result they have sometimes developed different genre pedagogies.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work independently to plan and compose text. Research in college and university programs for students learning English (e.g., Matsuda, 2006) has found that students receive differing amounts of instruction in these skills in writing courses, even those that focus on academic writing. As Matsuda noted, "In many composition classrooms, …language issues beyond simple 'grammar' correction are not addressed extensively, even when the assessment of student texts is based at least partly on students' proficiency in the privileged variety of English" (Standard Written English) (Matsuda, 2006, p. 640).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%