2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mysterious diffuse UV radiation and axion quark nugget dark matter model

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The AQNs may also alleviate the tension between standard model cosmology and the recent EDGES observation of a stronger than anticipated 21 cm absorption feature as argued in [ 22 ]. The AQNs may also explain a recently observed “exotic” diffuse UV radiation in our galaxy [ 23 ] with very puzzling features, which are very hard to interpret within conventional astrophysical models [ 24 ]. The AQNs might be also responsible for famed long standing problem of the “Solar Corona Mystery” [ 25 , 26 ] when the so-called “nanoflares” conjectured by Parker long ago [ 27 ] are identified with the annihilation events in the AQN framework.…”
Section: The Aqn Dm Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AQNs may also alleviate the tension between standard model cosmology and the recent EDGES observation of a stronger than anticipated 21 cm absorption feature as argued in [ 22 ]. The AQNs may also explain a recently observed “exotic” diffuse UV radiation in our galaxy [ 23 ] with very puzzling features, which are very hard to interpret within conventional astrophysical models [ 24 ]. The AQNs might be also responsible for famed long standing problem of the “Solar Corona Mystery” [ 25 , 26 ] when the so-called “nanoflares” conjectured by Parker long ago [ 27 ] are identified with the annihilation events in the AQN framework.…”
Section: The Aqn Dm Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to emphasize that in this work with the main goal to study the AQN-induced effects which may impact the structure formation at z ∈ (5 − 15) when ionization fraction x e is expected to be sufficiently large, we use the same basic parameters which had been previously used for variety of different applications in dramatically different environments, including ref. [17] with explanation of the observed puzzling FUV emission at present time. In both cases (present time and high redshifted epoch) the physics is the same and is determined by the coupling [ρ DM (r) • ρ visible (r)], which essentially enters the observed correlation (1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…This expression for x e (T gas ) can be substituted to formulae for brem and coll as given by ( 13) and ( 14) correspondingly to estimate the key parameter, the cooling rate Λ(T gas ) entering formula (12). Assuming that x e (T gas ) 1 one can expand (17) to arrive to the following simplified expression for the cooling rate which is not valid for low temperatures when x e strongly deviates from unity and expansion is not justified, Λ(T gas ) 10 −24 erg cm 3 • s 0.44…”
Section: Dm-visible Matter Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, there is very strong excess of the diffuse UV emission which cannot be explained by conventional astrophysical sources as it dramatically deviates from locations of the UV emitting stars. As argued in [42] this puzzling diffuse UV emission can be naturally understood within the same AQN framework. One should emphasize that the corresponding estimates in dramatically different environment were based on the same basic parameters of the AQN model, being used in the present proposal interpreting the MME as the AQN annihilation events in the Earth's atmosphere.…”
Section: Radio Pulses and The Distributed Acoustic Sensing (Das)mentioning
confidence: 74%