1984
DOI: 10.12930/0271-9517-4.2.75
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: A Resource for Developmental Advising

Abstract: Sllcl~ o~~lconfi exanplify academic advisiig as a developmental process that enhances the quality o r higher echrration. \ V l w adtiring si~~lenls rlevelopmrm~dy, the advisor may use lllc stuclenl hadbook to ~doir~l:v ot I~cr ~~IIIPUL murcxs that will as& students to improw [heir decision making, \~trlyil~p, Ic:~dcrdrip, coping, and valuing abilities ruld skills.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One significant tool was the Myers Briggs Type Indicator. Gordon and Carberry (1984) wrote that when this type of tool was interpreted effectively, it aided the advisor in understanding the advisee to build a supportive and empowering relationship. Gordon's focus on inventories as tools had an effect on relationship development and on her colleagues' view of her and her work.…”
Section: Gordon's Contribution To Scholarship Addressing Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One significant tool was the Myers Briggs Type Indicator. Gordon and Carberry (1984) wrote that when this type of tool was interpreted effectively, it aided the advisor in understanding the advisee to build a supportive and empowering relationship. Gordon's focus on inventories as tools had an effect on relationship development and on her colleagues' view of her and her work.…”
Section: Gordon's Contribution To Scholarship Addressing Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When viewed from a holistic perspective, some very important details about her scholarship could be missed. By examining her work closely, one can only be impressed by the breadth of methodological approaches she employed; they ranged from the use of quantitative experimental design methodologies (''The Retention of Major-Changers: A Longitudinal Study'' [Steele, Kennedy, & Gordon, 1993] [Gordon & Carberry, 1984] and ''Developmental Advising Revisited'' [Gordon & Grites, 2000]). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%