2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1251-8050(01)01658-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mw 7.1, Hector Mine, California earthquake: surface rupture, surface displacement field, and fault slip solution from ERS SAR data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the north/south correlation image, a secondary rupture branches to the north where the main rupture bends. The coseismic displacement measured on this secondary branch is up to 1 m. The location of the fault trace and the surface fault slip recovered from the SPOT images compare well with the surface ruptures and fault slip measured in the field [49], and from SAR images [48], [50], [51]. We observed in Fig.…”
Section: ) Processing Stepssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In the north/south correlation image, a secondary rupture branches to the north where the main rupture bends. The coseismic displacement measured on this secondary branch is up to 1 m. The location of the fault trace and the surface fault slip recovered from the SPOT images compare well with the surface ruptures and fault slip measured in the field [49], and from SAR images [48], [50], [51]. We observed in Fig.…”
Section: ) Processing Stepssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Similar asymmetry of the coseismic displacement field was observed in the case of Athens 1999 M s = 5.9 earthquake (Konotes et al, 2000;Foumelis et al, 2009), attributed to the postseismic deformation, as expressed by the reactivation of the secondary fault zone producing surface deformation of more than a fringe. Overall, aseismic afterslip on the main rupture zone, as well as poroelastic rebound in the shallow crust have a significant contribution on the coseismic displacement field, especially when the examined period covers significant part of the postseismic period/activity (Peltzer et al, 1998(Peltzer et al, , 2001Peltzer and Crapé, 1999;Donnellan et al, 2002;Liu et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The global positioning system, GPS, is in wide use and there have been a number of GPS surveys focused on the determination of decadal slip-rates in central Asia (Banerjee and Burgmann, 2002;Bendick et al, 2000;Bilham et al, 1997;Chen et al, 2004;Chen et al, 2000;Larson et al, 1999;Shen et al, 2001b;Wallace et al, 2004;Wang et al, 2002;Zhang et al, 2004). More recently interferometric, synthetic aperture radar, InSAR, previously applied in imaging relatively large coseismic strains (Massonnet et al, 1993;Peltzer et al, 2001b;Peltzer et al, 1994;Peltzer and Rosen, 1995) has been applied to the interseismic regime, generating decadal slip-rate determinations (Peltzer et al, 2001a;Wright et al, 2004). Both GPS and InSAR have been applied in attempts to constrain the velocity field associated with the IndoAsian collision, and in determining slip-rates on individual faults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%