2006
DOI: 10.1785/0120050261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mw 6.4 Damas, Costa Rica, Earthquake of 20 November 2004: Aftershocks and Slip Distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
14

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…2002), Q: 1999 M w 6.9 Quepos (location from Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica) and O: 2002 M w 6.4 Osa (preliminary location from Jacó and RSN networks combined). Orange star: upper‐plate, 2004 M w 6.4 Damas earthquake (Pacheco et al . 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2002), Q: 1999 M w 6.9 Quepos (location from Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica) and O: 2002 M w 6.4 Osa (preliminary location from Jacó and RSN networks combined). Orange star: upper‐plate, 2004 M w 6.4 Damas earthquake (Pacheco et al . 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where deformation is localized, such as the M w = 6.4 Damas event, the strain is likewise in agreement with our results. For the Damas event Pacheco et al [2006] find a WSW–ENE trending shallow T axis. The change in the trajectory of d 1 in the Cordillera de Talamanca suggests that ridge collision is contributing to the contemporary motion of a fore‐arc sliver.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The focus of this paper is the western boundary of the Panama microplate, a diffuse zone of active deformation that traverses the densely populated area of Costa Rica's capital city of San Jose. This boundary has been referred to by Marshall et al [2000] as the Central Costa Rica Deformed Belt (CCRDB), and is the site of numerous damaging upper crustal earthquakes [e.g., Pacheco et al , 2006] (Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mientras que en AALJ el valor máximo fue de 415 cm/s 2 en PQSP fue de 231 cm/s 2 . Probablemente otros factores también influyan en estas diferencias como lo son posibles efectos de directividad de la fuente sísmica en el caso del sismo de Piedras Negras y falta de estos en el sismo de Damas (Pacheco et al, 2006), pero los efectos de sitio son claramente diferentes entre ambas estaciones, siendo mayor en AALJ.…”
Section: Discusión Y Resultadosunclassified