2014
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The MUSIC of galaxy clusters – II. X-ray global properties and scaling relations

Abstract: We present the X-ray properties and scaling relations of a large sample of clusters extracted from the Marenostrum MUltidark SImulations of galaxy Clusters (MU-SIC) dataset. We focus on a sub-sample of 179 clusters at redshift z ∼ 0.11, with 3.2 × 10 14 h −1 M ⊙ < M vir < 2 × 10 15 h −1 M ⊙ , complete in mass. We employed the X-ray photon simulator PHOX to obtain synthetic Chandra observations and derive observable-like global properties of the intracluster medium (ICM), as X-ray temperature (T X ) and luminos… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

12
51
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(180 reference statements)
12
51
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter authors use the Chandra bolometric band (0.3 − 12 keV), which explains the higher Xray luminosity compared to the MCXC data. In comparison, our clusters evolve along a scaling relation that is somewhat shallower than both Arnaud et al (2010) and Le Brun et al (2014), consistent with Biffi et al (2014) (who however used the larger spectral window) but slightly steeper than a simple self-similar scaling ∝ M 4/3 (shown as a green dashed line in the figure and whose normalisation has been obtained by fitting to the MCXC data). In fact, the best-fit slope in our case is closer to 1.2, but we do not want to make a more quantitative statement at this stage since the comparison of evolving small (autocorrelated) samples should be taken with some caution for making rigorous predictions.…”
Section: X-ray Observablessupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter authors use the Chandra bolometric band (0.3 − 12 keV), which explains the higher Xray luminosity compared to the MCXC data. In comparison, our clusters evolve along a scaling relation that is somewhat shallower than both Arnaud et al (2010) and Le Brun et al (2014), consistent with Biffi et al (2014) (who however used the larger spectral window) but slightly steeper than a simple self-similar scaling ∝ M 4/3 (shown as a green dashed line in the figure and whose normalisation has been obtained by fitting to the MCXC data). In fact, the best-fit slope in our case is closer to 1.2, but we do not want to make a more quantitative statement at this stage since the comparison of evolving small (autocorrelated) samples should be taken with some caution for making rigorous predictions.…”
Section: X-ray Observablessupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Due to the known biases in estimating temperatures from simulated clusters that reflect temperatures measured from X-ray spectroscopy (see e.g. Biffi et al 2014, for in-depth comparisons), we show a range of differently weighted temperature estimates in the different panels of the figure. First, we compare with the spectroscopic-like temperature as introduced by Mazzotta et al (2004) as…”
Section: X-ray Observablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biffi et al (2014) and the observational findings ofLovisari et al (2015) (1.67 ± 0.08) andMantz et al (2016b) (1.63 ± 0.04).…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The initial conditions for our zoom simulations were drawn from the MUSIC-2 cluster catalog (Sembolini et al 2013;Sembolini et al 2014;Biffi et al 2014) 1 of re-simulated halos from the MultiDark cosmological simulation 2 . All the data from the parent simulation are accessible online through the MultiDark Database 3 .…”
Section: The Datamentioning
confidence: 99%