2021
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202040225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The MUSEHubbleUltra Deep Field Survey

Abstract: We investigate the specific angular momentum (sAM) j(< r) profiles of intermediate redshift (0.4 < z < 1.4) star-forming galaxies (SFGs) in the relatively unexplored regime of low masses (down to M⋆ ∼ 108 M⊙) and small sizes (down to Re ∼ 1.5 kpc), and we characterize the sAM scaling relation (i.e., Fall relation) and its redshift evolution. We have developed a 3D methodology to constrain sAM profiles of the star-forming gas using a forward modeling approach with GAlPAK3D that incorporates the effects… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 151 publications
(232 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 3D algorithm GalPaK 3D allows to fit the kinematics and morphological parameters simultaneously and thus no prior information is required on the inclination 3 . The agreement between HST-based and MUSE-based inclinations is typically better than 7 • (rms) for galaxies with 25 < i < 80 as demonstrated in Contini et al (2016) and with mock data-cubes (Bouché et al 2021) derived from the Illustris "NewGeneration 50 Mpc" (TNG50) simulations (Nelson et al 2019;Pillepich et al 2019). Nonetheless, we checked that the inclinations i and Sérsic n parameters obtained from the [O ii] MUSE data are consistent with those obtained from the HST/F160W images (see Tables 1 and 2).…”
Section: Simultaneous Measurements Of the Morphology And Kinematics F...mentioning
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The 3D algorithm GalPaK 3D allows to fit the kinematics and morphological parameters simultaneously and thus no prior information is required on the inclination 3 . The agreement between HST-based and MUSE-based inclinations is typically better than 7 • (rms) for galaxies with 25 < i < 80 as demonstrated in Contini et al (2016) and with mock data-cubes (Bouché et al 2021) derived from the Illustris "NewGeneration 50 Mpc" (TNG50) simulations (Nelson et al 2019;Pillepich et al 2019). Nonetheless, we checked that the inclinations i and Sérsic n parameters obtained from the [O ii] MUSE data are consistent with those obtained from the HST/F160W images (see Tables 1 and 2).…”
Section: Simultaneous Measurements Of the Morphology And Kinematics F...mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The sample of [O ii] emitters was selected from the mosaic catalogue (Inami et al 2017) where we chose galaxies with the highest S/N per spaxel in [O ii] that were not face-on (using the [O ii] inclinations estimated in Bouché et al 2021). From the catalog, we found 9 galaxies matching these criteria, listed in Table 1, with some reaching S /N pix ∼ 100 in the central spaxel.…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations