2017
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The MUSE Hubble Ultra Deep Field Survey

Abstract: We present the MUSE Hubble Ultra Deep Survey, a mosaic of nine MUSE fields covering 90% of the entire HUDF region with a 10-h deep exposure time, plus a deeper 31-h exposure in a single 1.15 arcmin 2 field. The improved observing strategy and advanced data reduction results in datacubes with sub-arcsecond spatial resolution (0 . 65 at 7000 Å) and accurate astrometry (0 . 07 rms). We compare the broadband photometric properties of the datacubes to HST photometry, finding a good agreement in zeropoint up to m AB… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

10
397
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 336 publications
(421 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
10
397
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The data of the MUSE HUDF Survey were obtained as part of the MUSE GTO program (PI: R. Bacon). The MUSE HUDF Survey design is presented in Bacon et al (2017). It consists of two layers of different depths: the mosaic is composed of 9 MUSE pointings that cover a 3 × 3 area (9.92 arcmin 2 ) with an integration time of ≈ 10 hours; the udf-10 is a deeper integration at a 1 × 1 sub field within the mosaic, with an integration time of ≈ 31 hours.…”
Section: Muse Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The data of the MUSE HUDF Survey were obtained as part of the MUSE GTO program (PI: R. Bacon). The MUSE HUDF Survey design is presented in Bacon et al (2017). It consists of two layers of different depths: the mosaic is composed of 9 MUSE pointings that cover a 3 × 3 area (9.92 arcmin 2 ) with an integration time of ≈ 10 hours; the udf-10 is a deeper integration at a 1 × 1 sub field within the mosaic, with an integration time of ≈ 31 hours.…”
Section: Muse Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimated 1 σ surface brightness limits are 2.8 × 10 −20 erg s −1 cm −2 Å −1 arcsec −2 and 5.5 × 10 −20 erg s −1 cm −2 Å −1 arcsec −2 in udf-10 and mosaic, respectively, in the wavelength range of 7000-8500 Å (excluding regions of OH sky emission, see Inami et al 2017, Bacon et al in prep. for more details). For instance, the estimated 3 σ flux limits are 1.5 × 10 −19 erg s −1 cm −2 and 3.1 × 10 −19 erg s −1 cm −2 in udf-10 and mosaic, respectively, for a point-like source extracted over three spectral channels (i.e., 3.75Å) around 7000 Å (see Figure 20 in Bacon et al 2017). The PSF and noise characteristics are similar to the DR1 data, except in the reddest part of the wavelength range.…”
Section: Muse Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in some cases there are no bright point sources in the field of view because it is too small and/or is located at high galactic latitude where Galactic stars are rare. This is for example the case of deep-field observations like the Hubble Ultra Deep Field (UDF, Bacon et al 2017). A&A proofs: manuscript no.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we present results from the MUSE-Wide survey, a GTO programme complementing the ongoing ultra-deep pencil-beam MUSE surveys (Bacon et al 2017). MUSE-Wide trades depth for survey area by covering many fields with relatively shallow exposures (1 h per field).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%